Intellectual Property Rights and Artificial Intelligence: A Legal Exploration in Indonesia
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Intellectual Property Rights, Legal Framework, Indonesia, Innovation, LawAbstract
For the case of Indonesia, the legal status of artificial intelligence (AI) is in its early years. Quantitative research: Data was collected from 150 legal experts, AI practitioners and policymakers where structured questionnaires were deployed; together with the analysing of 75 AI-generated innovations in various domains The results demonstrate an enormous disconnect between current IPR regulations based on human authorship and the rapid evolution of AI technology, which can now produce copyrighted outputs. The consensus among respondents suggests that a full regulatory superstructure is required to grapple with the possibilities and problems AI as creator can provide. In addition, the research suggests there is scope to fill this void without further extending IP rights and quietly yet significantly reform current laws by specifying that AI-generated works may be owned by humans; thus creating legal certainty. This reported research can inform the overall debate on adapting IPR to AI innovations and highlights a need for policy changes around the world in order to promote innovation, creativity and Intellectual Property Rights in an AI-dominated environment.
Downloads
References
de Almeida, Patricia Gomes Rêgo, Carlos Denner dos Santos, and Josivania Silva Farias. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence Regulation: A Framework for Governance.” Ethics and Information Technology 23(3):505–25. doi: 10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z.
Andrini, Laurensia. 2018. “Redesigning Indonesia Copyright Act to Accommodate Autonomous Intelligent System: Status Quo and Room for Improvement.” 9(3). doi: doi:10.1515/ajle-2018-0013.
Aristodemou, Leonidas, and Frank Tietze. 2018. “The State-of-the-Art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A Literature Review on Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Analysing Intellectual Property (IP) Data.” World Patent Information 55:37–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2018.07.002.
Ayu Palar, Miranda Risang, Laina Rafianti, and Helitha Novianty Muchtar. 2023. “Inclusive Rights to Protect Communal Intellectual Property: Indonesian Perspective on Its New Government Regulation.” Cogent Social Sciences 9(2):2274431. doi: 10.1080/23311886.2023.2274431.
Bennett, Belinda, and Angela Daly. 2020. “Recognising Rights for Robots: Can We? Will We? Should We?” Law, Innovation and Technology 12(1):60–80. doi: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727063.
Brown, Rafael Dean. 2021. “Property Ownership and the Legal Personhood of Artificial Intelligence.” Information & Communications Technology Law 30(2):208–34. doi: 10.1080/13600834.2020.1861714.
Cheng, Le, and Xiuli Liu. 2023. “From Principles to Practices: The Intertextual Interaction between AI Ethical and Legal Discourses.” 8(1):31–52. doi: doi:10.1515/ijld-2023-2001.
Clark, Cristy, Nia Emmanouil, John Page, and Alessandro Pelizzon. 2019. “Can You Hear the Rivers Sing? Legal Personhood, Ontology, and the Nitty- Gritty of Governance.” Ecology Law Quarterly 45(4):787–844.
Ganco, Martin, Cameron D. Miller, and Puay Khoon Toh. 2020. “From Litigation to Innovation: Firms’ Ability to Litigate and Technological Diversification through Human Capital.” Strategic Management Journal 41(13):2436–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3203.
Ghosh, Ashish, Debasrita Chakraborty, and Anwesha Law. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence in Internet of Things.” CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 3(4):208–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/trit.2018.1008.
Grey, Alexandra, and Alyssa A. Severin. 2022. “Building towards Best Practice for Governments’ Public Communications in Languages Other than English: A Case Study of New South Wales, Australia.” Griffith Law Review 31(1):25–56. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2022.2031526.
Gürkaynak, Gönenç, İlay Yılmaz, Burak Yeşilaltay, and Berk Bengi. 2018. “Intellectual Property Law and Practice in the Blockchain Realm.” Computer Law & Security Review 34(4):847–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.027.
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2019. “Empirical Intersectionality: A Tale of Two Approaches BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy.” Pp. 95–132 in, edited by O. Hankivsky and J. S. Jordan-Zachery. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
He, Tianxiang. 2019. “The Sentimental Fools and the Fictitious Authors: Rethinking the Copyright Issues of AI-Generated Contents in China.” Asia Pacific Law Review 27(2):218–38. doi: 10.1080/10192557.2019.1703520.
De Hert, Paul, Vagelis Papakonstantinou, Gianclaudio Malgieri, Laurent Beslay, and Ignacio Sanchez. 2018. “The Right to Data Portability in the GDPR: Towards User-Centric Interoperability of Digital Services.” Computer Law & Security Review 34(2):193–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.10.003.
Kempeneer, Shirley, Ali Pirannejad, and Johan Wolswinkel. 2023. “Open Government Data from a Legal Perspective: An AI-Driven Systematic Literature Review.” Government Information Quarterly 40(3):101823. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101823.
Maccaro, A., D. Piaggio, S. Leesurakarn, N. Husen, S. Sekalala, S. Rai, and L. Pecchia. 2022. “On the Universality of Medical Device Regulations: The Case of Benin.” BMC Health Services Research 22(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08396-2.
Miller, Tim. 2019. “Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences.” Artificial Intelligence 267:1–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007.
Novelli, Claudio, Giorgio Bongiovanni, and Giovanni Sartor. 2022. “A Conceptual Framework for Legal Personality and Its Application to AI.” Jurisprudence 13(2):194–219. doi: 10.1080/20403313.2021.2010936.
Parihar, Veena, Ayasha Malik, Bhawna, Bharat Bhushan, and Rajasekhar Chaganti. 2023. “From Smart Devices to Smarter Systems: The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) with Characteristics, Architecture, Use Cases and Challenges BT - AI Models for Blockchain-Based Intelligent Networks in IoT Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.” Pp. 1–28 in, edited by B. Bhushan, A. K. Sangaiah, and T. N. Nguyen. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Pramanik, Pijush Kanti Dutta, Saurabh Pal, and Prasenjit Choudhury. 2018. “Beyond Automation: The Cognitive IoT. Artificial Intelligence Brings Sense to the Internet of Things BT - Cognitive Computing for Big Data Systems Over IoT: Frameworks, Tools and Applications.” Pp. 1–37 in, edited by A. K. Sangaiah, A. Thangavelu, and V. Meenakshi Sundaram. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Rodrigues, Rowena. 2020. “Legal and Human Rights Issues of AI: Gaps, Challenges and Vulnerabilities.” Journal of Responsible Technology 4:100005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005.
Smits, Jan, and Tijn Borghuis. 2022. “Generative AI and Intellectual Property Rights BT - Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice.” Pp. 323–44 in, edited by B. Custers and E. Fosch-Villaronga. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
Yeung, Karen. 2019. “Regulation by Blockchain: The Emerging Battle for Supremacy between the Code of Law and Code as Law.” The Modern Law Review 82(2):207–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12399.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE) © 2024 by Inovasi Analisis Data is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0



















