Publication Process

 

 
 
EDITORIAL WORKFLOW

Publication Process

Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE)

A transparent, accountable, and professionally managed editorial workflow from submission to publication.

PLICE Journal Cover
i

Editorial Workflow Overview

Every manuscript submitted to Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE) undergoes a structured editorial and peer-review process to ensure academic quality, originality, ethical compliance, and relevance to the journal's focus in public law, criminal law, crime studies, governance, human rights, justice, and socio-legal research.

The process is managed through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform to support transparency, accountability, editorial documentation, communication tracking, and quality control from submission to publication.

Estimated Turnaround Time: approximately 8–14 weeks from submission to publication, depending on reviewer availability, revision quality, and editorial workload.
6 EDITORIAL STAGES

Step-by-Step Editorial Stages

Detailed workflow from manuscript submission to final publication.

 
1

1. Submission and Administrative Pre-Check

Duration: 1–7 Days

The author submits the manuscript through the PLICE OJS platform. The editorial office conducts an administrative and technical screening before the manuscript proceeds to editorial evaluation.

  • Completeness of submission files, including manuscript, title page, and required statements.
  • Compliance with PLICE template, formatting, and author guidelines.
  • Scope alignment with public law, criminal law, crime studies, governance, or socio-legal research.
  • Initial similarity and ethical compliance screening.

Note: manuscripts not meeting basic requirements may be returned for correction before review.

2

2. Initial Editorial Screening

Duration: 1–2 Weeks

The Editor-in-Chief or assigned editor evaluates the manuscript's relevance, originality, legal contribution, research clarity, and suitability for peer review.

  • Assessment of topic relevance and contribution to PLICE's focus and scope.
  • Review of abstract, research problem, legal reasoning, methodology, and references.
  • Desk decision: proceed to review, request preliminary revision, or reject if unsuitable.
3

3. Double-Blind Peer Review

Duration: 4–8 Weeks

Eligible manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. PLICE applies a double-blind peer-review model where author and reviewer identities are concealed.

  • Reviewers evaluate originality, legal reasoning, methodology, references, and contribution.
  • Recommendations may include accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
  • Reviewer comments support editorial decision-making and manuscript improvement.
4

4. Author Revision

Duration: 2–4 Weeks

Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments and editorial instructions. A detailed response to reviewers must be submitted together with the revised manuscript.

  • Authors should respond to each reviewer comment point by point.
  • All changes should be clearly described in the response document.
  • Major revisions may be returned to reviewers for further assessment.
5

5. Editorial Decision and Acceptance

Duration: 1–2 Weeks

The Editor-in-Chief or handling editor makes the final editorial decision based on reviewer recommendations, manuscript quality, revision adequacy, and journal standards.

  • If accepted, authors receive an official Letter of Acceptance (LoA).
  • Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout, and production.
  • Publication fee instructions are provided only after acceptance.
6

6. Production and Publication

Duration: 2–3 Weeks

The accepted manuscript enters the final production stage before online publication.

  • Copyediting: language, citation, grammar, and academic style correction.
  • Layout: formatting into final PDF and/or HTML publication format.
  • Proofreading: author confirmation of the final galley proof.
  • Publication: DOI registration, metadata preparation, and online publication.
EDITORIAL METRICS

Editorial Transparency and Quality Indicators

PLICE is committed to maintaining transparency, editorial accountability, and responsible peer-review management. Editorial indicators are used to support continuous improvement in publication quality.

IC
Initial Check Administrative and scope screening
2R
2 Reviewers Minimum peer-review standard
21
14–21 Days Target reviewer response period
OJS
OJS-Based Transparent editorial tracking

Indicators support editorial transparency and may be updated according to annual journal performance.

Transfer Workflow

Visual editorial flow inspired by a professional transfer-workflow diagram, adapted for PLICE and OJS-safe display.

Legend
×
Rejection
Manuscript is declined at screening or after review.
Acceptance
Accepted manuscript moves to production.
Transfer / Revision
Movement between editors, reviewers, and authors.
i
Prioritized Editorial Assessment
Initial internal check before external peer review.
Publisher
PLICE
Peer Review Cycle
Submission Journal
 
Peer Review Cycle
 
Receiving Editor
Journal A
Initial manuscript submission and administrative screening
A
R
Editorial Assessment
Scope fit, quality review, and editor decision routing
Decision point
Reviewer interaction
Desk decision / forward
Peer review
R1
Handling editor
ED
Peer review
R2
Review comments
Editorial synthesis
Review comments
Revised manuscript / editorial recommendation
Author revision may be requested before final decision.
Journal B
Revision or transfer destination when resubmission is needed
Revision / resubmission
Accept
×
Reject
Journal C
Accepted output proceeding to copyediting and publication
Possible return after revision
Final route to publication

Need Assistance?

For questions about the publication process, please contact the PLICE editorial team.

© 2026 Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE). Published by PT. Inovasi Analisis Data.

E-ISSN: 3064-5875 | P-ISSN: 3064-6057 | CC BY-SA 4.0