Peer Reviewers

REVIEWERS NASIONAL 
1. Jumanudin,S.H.,M.H., (Scopus, Sinta, Scholar, Orcid)., Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Karya Persada Muna, Muna, Indonesia.
2. Sitti Martini,S.H., M.H., (Scopus, Sinta, Scholar, Orcid)., Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Karya Persada Muna, Muna, Indonesia.
3. Dr. Mohammad Jamin., M.H.,(Scopus, Sinta, Scholar, Orcid)  Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia 
4. Hari Purwadi., M.H., (Scopus, Sinta, Scholar, Orcid).,  Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia.
5. Angkasa., M.H., (Scopus, Sinta, Scholar, Orcid).,  Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Mataram, Indonesia.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

REVIEWERS INTERNATIONAL RISEACRH Double-Blind Review

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

 

Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE)
Reviewer Guidelines

Thank you for agreeing to review for Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE). Your expertise ensures the publication of high-quality, impactful research in the field. Please adhere to the following guidelines during the review process.

1. Double-Blind Review Process

Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE) uses a double-blind review process to ensure impartiality. As a reviewer, you will not know the identities of the authors, and the authors will not know your identity. Please avoid any identifying information in your comments that could reveal your identity to the authors.

2. Review Criteria

Your review should focus on the following aspects:

a. Originality

  • Is the article original and does it present novel insights in the field of public law, crime, or related areas?
  • Does the article offer a unique contribution or perspective that adds to the existing body of knowledge?

b. Relevance and Scope

  • Is the topic relevant to the focus of PLICE?
  • Does the article align with current issues or trends in public law or crime studies?

c. Methodology

  • Are the research methods appropriate and clearly described?
  • Is the research design sound and robust?
  • Are the data or legal sources reliable and accurately referenced?

d. Argumentation and Analysis

  • Does the article present clear arguments supported by evidence?
  • Are the conclusions well-supported by the analysis?
  • Are legal interpretations, case studies, or data analysis adequately conducted?

e. Clarity and Structure

  • Is the article well-organized and easy to follow?
  • Is the writing clear, concise, and free of jargon?
  • Are the abstract, introduction, and conclusion well-defined and coherent?

f. Ethical Considerations

  • Has the article adhered to proper ethical standards for research and publication?
  • Are there any potential ethical concerns, including plagiarism or misrepresentation of data?

g. References

  • Are the references current, relevant, and appropriately cited?
  • Does the article engage with up-to-date research or legal cases in the field?

3. Recommendations

At the end of your review, please make a clear recommendation:

  • Accept: The article is ready for publication with minor or no revisions.
  • Minor Revisions: The article requires small improvements, but the overall quality is acceptable.
  • Major Revisions: Significant changes are required to meet publication standards.
  • Reject: The article is not suitable for publication due to fundamental issues.

4. Confidential Comments to the Editor

You may provide confidential comments to the editor regarding sensitive issues that the authors should not be aware of. Use this section to highlight any ethical concerns or additional notes.

5. Timeline

Please submit your review within [insert number] days of receiving the manuscript. Timely feedback helps us maintain the efficiency of the review process.

6. Confidentiality

Please treat the manuscript and review process as confidential. Do not share the manuscript with anyone, or discuss its content with others, unless permission has been granted by the editor.

By adhering to these guidelines, you ensure the integrity of the review process for Advances in Public Law and Crime (PLICE), helping us maintain high standards in legal scholarship.