Reviewer Guide

Reviewer Guide

Welcome to the PLICE (Advances in Public Law and Crime) Reviewer Guide. As a peer reviewer, you play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and integrity of our journal. This guide provides comprehensive information to help you understand your responsibilities, the review process, and the standards expected in your evaluations.

1. Role of a Reviewer

As a reviewer for PLICE, you are responsible for:

  • Evaluating the quality, relevance, and originality of submitted manuscripts.
  • Providing constructive feedback to authors to enhance their work.
  • Ensuring that the research adheres to ethical standards and methodological rigor.
  • Assisting the editorial team in making informed decisions regarding manuscript publication.

2. Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Confidentiality: Treat all manuscripts and related materials as confidential. Do not share or discuss the content with others without explicit permission.

  • Timeliness: Complete your reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe, typically [specify timeframe, e.g., 2-4 weeks]. Prompt reviews help maintain the journal’s publication schedule.

  • Conflict of Interest: Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect your impartiality. If a conflict exists, notify the editorial team immediately.

  • Constructive Feedback: Provide clear, objective, and constructive comments that can help authors improve their manuscripts. Highlight both strengths and areas for improvement.

3. Review Process

  1. Assignment: You will receive an invitation to review a manuscript via email. If you accept, the manuscript and relevant materials will be provided through our online submission system.

  2. Evaluation: Assess the manuscript based on the following criteria:

    • Relevance: Alignment with the journal’s scope and focus.
    • Originality: Novelty and contribution to the field of public law and crime.
    • Methodology: Appropriateness and rigor of research methods.
    • Clarity: Coherence, organization, and clarity of writing.
    • Validity: Soundness of arguments and conclusions.
    • Ethics: Compliance with ethical standards in research and reporting.

  3. Recommendation: Based on your evaluation, recommend one of the following:

    • Accept: The manuscript is suitable for publication with minor or no revisions.
    • Minor Revisions: The manuscript requires small changes before it can be accepted.
    • Major Revisions: Significant modifications are needed for the manuscript to be considered.
    • Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards or scope.

  4. Feedback Submission: Submit your detailed review through the online system, addressing both general and specific comments.

4. Ethical Standards

  • Integrity: Ensure that your review is unbiased and based solely on the content of the manuscript.
  • Confidentiality: Do not use any information obtained during the review process for personal gain or disclose it to unauthorized parties.
  • Respect: Provide feedback in a respectful and professional manner, avoiding personal remarks or derogatory language.

5. Manuscript Evaluation Criteria

When reviewing a manuscript for PLICE, consider the following aspects:

  • Title and Abstract: Clarity and accuracy in reflecting the study’s content.
  • Introduction: Clear articulation of the research problem and objectives.
  • Literature Review: Comprehensive and relevant coverage of existing research.
  • Methodology: Appropriateness and robustness of research design and methods.
  • Results: Clear and logical presentation of findings.
  • Discussion: Interpretation of results in the context of existing literature.
  • Conclusion: Summarization of key findings and implications for the field.
  • References: Proper citation and relevance of sources.
  • Formatting and Style: Adherence to the journal’s guidelines and academic standards.

6. Providing Constructive Feedback

  • Be Specific: Point out exact sections or statements that need improvement.
  • Be Balanced: Highlight both strengths and weaknesses.
  • Be Objective: Base your comments on evidence from the manuscript.
  • Be Clear: Ensure that your suggestions are understandable and actionable.

7. Review Submission Guidelines

  • Format: Submit your review in the format specified by the journal, typically through the online submission system.
  • Content: Include an overall assessment, detailed comments for authors, and confidential comments for the editor if necessary.
  • Anonymity: Maintain the confidentiality of your identity unless otherwise agreed upon.

8. Acknowledgment and Recognition

Reviewers are essential to the academic community. PLICE acknowledges your contributions by:

  • Listing your name in the journal’s annual Reviewer Recognition section (with your permission).
  • Providing certificates of appreciation upon request.
  • Offering discounts or waivers for journal publication fees (if applicable).

9. Continuous Improvement

We value your feedback on the review process. Please feel free to share any suggestions or concerns with the editorial team to help us enhance our procedures and support for reviewers.

Thank you for your dedication and commitment to upholding the standards of PLICE (Advances in Public Law and Crime). Your expertise and insights are invaluable in advancing scholarly research in the field of public law and criminal justice.

For further assistance or inquiries, please contact us:

Email: admin@analysisdata.co.id
Website: https://analysisdata.co.id/index.php/PLICE

PLICE Editorial Team
PT. Inovasi Analisis Data