Enhancing ESG Performance in Islamic Banks: The Impact of Shari’ah Governance Quality Across Countries
Keywords:
Sharia governance, ESG performance, Islamic banks, sustainability, Governance structureAbstract
Objective; The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Shari’ah governance quality on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance in Islamic banks, contributing to the understanding of governance structures in promoting sustainability practices.
Methods; A quantitative method was employed in the form of multiple regression analysis on the data of a sample of Islamic banks. The study investigated the linkage of Shari’ah governance quality, Shari’ah supervisory board size, operational structures and ESG performance in environmental, social and governance dimensions.
Results; The results show that Shari’ah governance quality leads to a significant improvement in ESG performance with improvement in all dimensions. The number of members on the Shari’ah supervisory board and operational frameworks positively affect ESG outcomes as well. In contrast, little impact on ESG performance was detected when segmented by bank size and market capitalization.
Novelty; The study contributes by shedding light on the underexplored aspect of governance through Shari’ah governance as a driver for achieving sustainable practices in the Islamic banking context.
Research Implications; The research contributes to enhancing ESG performance in Islamic banks by highlighting the importance of Shari’ah governance, Nigerian policymakers and bank managers striving for convergence of Islamic banking and global sustainability objectives could benefit greatly from the study.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. A., & Abhayawansa, S. (2022). Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’ of sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, 102309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102309
Al Mannai, M., & Ahmed, H. (2019). Exploring the workings of Shari’ah supervisory board in Islamic finance: A perspective of Shari’ah scholars from GCC. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 97–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.05.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.05.017
Alghafes, R., Karim, S., Aliani, K., Qureishi, N., & Alkayed, L. (2024). Influence of key ESG factors on Islamic banks’ financial performance: Evidence from GCC countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 96, 103629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103629
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
Azam, M., Akhtar, J., Ali, S. A., & Mohy-Ud-Din, K. (2019). The moderating role of Shariah compliance on the relationship between firm profitability and CSR activities. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(4), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2019-0039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-02-2019-0039
Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125791. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125791
Birindelli, I., Galise, G., & Ishii, H. (2018). A family of degenerate elliptic operators: Maximum principle and its consequences. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse Non Linéaire, 35(2), 417–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2017.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anihpc.2017.05.003
Del Giudice, A., & Rigamonti, S. (2020). Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145670
Dmuchowski, P., Dmuchowski, W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H., & Gworek, B. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment – Global trends and Poland’s perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023
Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-Shari`ah, Maslahah, and Corporate Social Responsibility. American Journal of Islam and Society, 24(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v24i1.415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v24i1.415
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106
Fatmawati, D., Ariffin, N. M., Abidin, N. H. Z., & Osman, A. Z. (2022). Shariah governance in Islamic banks: Practices, practitioners and praxis. Global Finance Journal, 51, 100555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100555
Freeman, R. E., & David, L. R. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. (2018). Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318773750
Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., & Naciti, V. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of ESG performance in the banking industry: From the current status to future directions. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101684
Ghaemi Asl, M., Rashidi, M. M., Tavakkoli, H. R., & Rezgui, H. (2024). Does Islamic investing modify portfolio performance? Time-varying optimization strategies for conventional and Shariah energy-ESG-utilities portfolio. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 94, 37–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2023.12.010
Gözübüyük, R., Kock, C. J., & Ünal, M. (2020). Who appropriates centrality rents? The role of institutions in regulating social networks in the global Islamic finance industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 764–787. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0202-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0202-4
Habib, F. (2023). Islamic Finance and Sustainability: The Need to Reframe Notions of Shariah Compliance, Purpose, and Value BT - Islamic Finance, FinTech, and the Road to Sustainability: Reframing the Approach in the Post-Pandemic Era (Z. H. Jumat, S. Hafiz Khateeb, & S. Nazim Ali (eds.); pp. 15–40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13302-2_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13302-2_2
Hassan, M. K., Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Paltrinieri, A., & Piserà, S. (2023). Equity costs and risks in emerging markets: Are ESG and Sharia principles complementary? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101904. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101904
Hassan, M. K., & Raza Rabbani, M. (2023). Sharia governance standards and the role of AAOIFI: a comprehensive literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(5), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-0111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-0111
Hassanein, A., & Tharwat, H. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Islamic Shari’ah-Compliant Perspective. In A. I. Hunjra & K. Hussainey (Eds.), The Emerald Handbook of Ethical Finance and Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 397–416). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-406-720241017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-406-720241017
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., Acquaye, A., Fujii, H., Ndiaye, M. M., Yamoah, F. A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2021). A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
Jan, A. A. (2021). Developing an Islamic Corporate Governance framework to examine sustainability performance in Islamic Banks and Financial Institutions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652621023179?via%3Dihub DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128099
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership, 77–132. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674274051-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674274051-006
Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Stakeholders’ perspectives on critical success factors for environmental social and governance (ESG) implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121583
Lee, M. T., & Suh, I. (2022). Understanding the effects of Environment, Social, and Governance conduct on financial performance: Arguments for a process and integrated modelling approach. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 100004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100004
Madhani, P. (2023). Enhancing HR Efficiency and Effectiveness with Blockchain Deployment. IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 20(1), 5–22. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=164173189&site=ehost-live&custid=s4121186
Mallin, C., Farag, H., & Ow-Yong, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 103, S21–S38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.001
Mohamad Ariff, A., Abd Majid, N., Kamarudin, K. A., Zainul Abidin, A. F., & Muhmad, S. N. (2024). Corporate ESG performance, Shariah-compliant status and cash holdings. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2022-0217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2022-0217
Mohd Zain, F. A., Muhamad, S. F., Abdullah, H., Sheikh Ahmad Tajuddin, S. A. F., & Wan Abdullah, W. A. (2024). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles with Maqasid al-Shariah: a blueprint for sustainable takaful operations. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422
Pozzoli, M., Pagani, A., & Paolone, F. (2022). The impact of audit committee characteristics on ESG performance in the European Union member states: Empirical evidence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371, 133411. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133411
Qoyum, A., Sakti, M. R. P., Thaker, H. M. T., & AlHashfi, R. U. (2022). Does the islamic label indicate good environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance? Evidence from sharia-compliant firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 306–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.06.001
Ranjbari, M., Shams Esfandabadi, Z., Zanetti, M. C., Scagnelli, S. D., Siebers, P.-O., Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Quatraro, F., & Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660
Shahzad, U., Ghaemi Asl, M., Khalfaoui, R., & Tedeschi, M. (2024). Extreme contributions of conventional investments vis-à-vis Islamic ones to renewables. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113932. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113932
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board Attributes, Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy, and Corporate Environmental and Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2460-9
Tumewang, Y. K., Yunita, D. N., & Hassan, M. K. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of ESG in Islamic banks: mapping current trends and projecting future research direction. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2023-0513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2023-0513
Wijayanti, R., & Setiawan, D. (2023). The role of the board of directors and the sharia supervisory board on sustainability reports. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), 100083. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100083
Zou, F., Huang, L., Ghaemi Asl, M., Delnavaz, M., & Tiwari, S. (2023). Natural resources and green economic recovery in responsible investments: Role of ESG in context of Islamic sustainable investments. Resources Policy, 86, 104195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104195
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wannes Milena, Alberto Stefan (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal International Economic Sharia (JIES) © 2024 by Inovasi Analisis Data is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0








