Reviewer Guide
Reviewer Guide for Applied Health Administration (APPHA)
Thank you for agreeing to review a manuscript for the Applied Health Administration (APPHA) journal. Your expertise and feedback are vital in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal. This guide is designed to assist you in your review process.
Objectives of the Review
- Quality Assessment: Evaluate the overall quality of the manuscript, including originality, significance, and clarity.
- Relevance: Determine the relevance of the manuscript to the journal’s scope and focus.
- Methodological Rigor: Assess the appropriateness of the research design and methods used in the study.
- Results and Conclusions: Evaluate whether the results are well-presented and whether the conclusions are supported by the data.
- Ethical Considerations: Ensure that ethical standards were upheld in the research process.
Review Criteria
-
Originality and Contribution:
- Does the manuscript present new findings or insights in health administration?
- How does it contribute to existing literature and knowledge in the field?
-
Clarity and Structure:
- Is the manuscript well-organized and clearly written?
- Are the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions presented logically?
-
Methodological Appropriateness:
- Are the research design and methodology suitable for the research questions?
- Are the data collection and analysis methods clearly described and justified?
-
Results and Interpretation:
- Are the results presented in a clear and understandable manner (e.g., use of tables, figures)?
- Are the interpretations of the results sound and supported by evidence?
-
Literature Review:
- Is the literature review comprehensive and relevant?
- Are appropriate references cited to support claims and contextualize the study?
-
Ethical Standards:
- Were ethical considerations addressed in the research (e.g., consent, approval by ethics committees)?
- Are there any potential conflicts of interest disclosed?
-
Language and Style:
- Is the manuscript free from grammatical errors and typos?
- Is the writing style appropriate for an academic audience?
Review Process
-
Confidentiality:
- Treat the manuscript as a confidential document. Do not share it with others or use its content for personal research.
-
Timeliness:
- Aim to complete your review within the specified timeframe to facilitate the publication process.
-
Constructive Feedback:
- Provide detailed and constructive comments that can help the authors improve their work. Highlight both strengths and areas for improvement.
-
Recommendations:
- Provide a clear recommendation regarding the manuscript: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Reject. Justify your recommendation with specific comments.
Final Remarks
Your contribution as a reviewer is invaluable to the APPHA journal and the advancement of health administration knowledge. We appreciate your time and effort in providing a thorough and thoughtful review.
Thank you for your commitment to the integrity and quality of research in health administration!