Employee Voice Mechanisms, Voice Embeddedness, and Silence in Tax Professionals

Crossmark

Click to verify publication status

Authors

  • Radya Brian Aurelio a. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business,, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang City, Indonesia, 50131
  • Diana Puspitasari b. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business,, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang City, Indonesia, 50131

Keywords:

Employee voice, Voice embeddedness, Employee silence, Tax professionals, Power distance

Abstract

Purpose – Building on social exchange theory and emotional dissonance hypothesis, we draw overarching attention to how formality of employee voice mechanism shapes employee silence via perceived voice embeddedness, with the moderating role of power distance orientation in professional tax environment.

Design/methodology/approach – The research is a quantitative survey design, performs the structural equation modeling and tests the moderated mediation model that intertwines MV mechanisms with embeddedness perceptions and cultural orientation.

Findings – Results indicate the degree to which employee voice mechanisms uniformly eliminate silence. Their efficacy is contingent on whether employees believe that voice is actually embedded in organizational processes of decision making. Perceptual voice embednenss is central for those mechanisms of contact to be transformed into attenuated silence or pure symbolicity streamed from the speech chain. In addition, the hierarchical culture orientation attenuates the silence-mitigating effect of embedded voice, meaning that cultural context influences how employees react to formal voice channels.

Originality/value – This study contributes to the employee voice literature by incorporating voice embeddedness as a crucial explanatory mechanism and by revealing its contingent effectiveness according to power distance orientation. It applies voice theory further to the professional tax contexts under-researched in previous studies.

Research Implications – This finding underscores the need to look beyond the simple existence of voice mechanisms to how employees perceive their credibility and impact. The research highlights the necessity of combining institutional and cultural approaches to examine employee voice and silence in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Radya Brian Aurelio, a. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business,, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang City, Indonesia, 50131

    Radya Brian Aurelio is an undergraduate student in the Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Indonesia. His academic interests include organizational behavior, employee voice and silence, leadership dynamics, and managerial decision-making in professional and service-based organizations. His research focuses on behavioral and institutional perspectives in management, with an emphasis on quantitative analysis to examine how organizational practices influence employee participation and communication.

  • Diana Puspitasari, b. Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business,, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang City, Indonesia, 50131

    Diana Puspitasari, S.E., M.M., is a lecturer in the Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Indonesia. Her academic expertise includes financial management, macroeconomic policy analysis, and applied econometrics. She has published in nationally and internationally indexed journals and actively supervises research in monetary economics and financial risk management. Her research emphasizes the integration of macroeconomic theory with empirical analysis to support evidence-based policy and managerial decision-making.

References

Allen, M. M. C. (2014). Chapter 3: Hirschman and voice. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939272.00010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939272.00010

Cox, A., Zagelmeyer, S., & Marchington, M. (2006). Embedding employee involvement and participation at work. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00017.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00017.x

Dibben, P., Cunningham, I., Bakalov, N., & Xian, H. (2023). Conceptualising employee voice in the majority world: Using multiple intellectual traditions inspired by the work of Mick Marchington. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 564–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12473

Dowding, K., John, P., Mergoupis, T., & Van Vugt, M. (2000). Exit, voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments. European Journal of Political Research, 37(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007134730724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007134730724

Dundon, T., Wilkinson *, A., Marchington, M., & Ackers, P. (2004). The meanings and purpose of employee voice. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/095851904100016773359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/095851904100016773359

Hirschman, A. O. (1978). Exit, Voice, and the State. World Politics, 31(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2307/2009968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009968

Lavell, A., McFarlane, C., Moore, H. L., Woodcraft, S., & Yap, C. (2023). Pathways to Urban Equality through the Sustainable Development Goals: Modes of Extreme Poverty, Resilience, and Prosperity. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 15(1), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2226099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2226099

Lavelle, Jonathan, Gunnigle, Patrick, & McDonnell, Anthony. (2010). Patterning employee voice in multinational companies. Human Relations, 63(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709348935 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709348935

Lupu, I., & Empson, L. (2015). Illusio and overwork: playing the game in the accounting field. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(8), 1310–1340. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2015-1984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2015-1984

McMahon, J., O’Sullivan, M., MacCurtain, S., Murphy, C., & Ryan, L. (2021). “It’s Not Us, It’s You!”: Extending Managerial Control through Coercion and Internalisation in the Context of Workplace Bullying amongst Nurses in Ireland. In Societies (Vol. 11, Issue 2, p. 55). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11020055

McMahon, M., Doyle, E., & Kinsella, S. (2025). Intangible income shifting: the impact of digitalisation on falling corporate tax rates. International Tax and Public Finance, 32(5), 1335–1365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09883-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-025-09883-y

Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An Exploratory Study of Employee Silence: Issues that Employees Don’t Communicate Upward and Why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387

Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3707697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259200

Mowbray, S. (2022). Inquiry into homelessness amongst older people aged over 55 in NSW. June.

Nechanska, E., Hughes, E., & Dundon, T. (2020). Towards an integration of employee voice and silence. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100674. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.11.002

Wilkinson, A., Donaghey, J., Dundon, T., & Freeman, R. B. (2014). Handbook of Research on Employee Voice. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939272

Wilkinson, A., & Fay, C. (2011). New times for employee voice? Human Resource Management, 50(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20411

Wilkinson, B. R., & Hageman, A. M. (2023). The role of political elites in income tax system design and tax fairness. The British Accounting Review, 55(3), 101172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101172

Published

2025-04-10

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Brian Aurelio, R., & Puspitasari, D. (2025). Employee Voice Mechanisms, Voice Embeddedness, and Silence in Tax Professionals. Jurnal Inovasi Pajak Indonesia, 2(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.69725/jipi.v2i1.328

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.