Double-Blind Peer Review

Jurnal Inovasi Pajak Indonesia (JIPI) implements a rigorous Double-Blind process. Both reviewer and author identities are concealed to ensure impartiality. We adhere to COPE Ethical Standards.

Reviewer Selection Criteria

JIPI maintains a strict policy of selecting reviewers who are active academics and researchers with specific expertise in the manuscript's field.

• Active Academic Engagement: We prioritize reviewers currently active in teaching and research institutions. This ensures they possess up-to-date theoretical knowledge and scientific rigor.
• Subject Matter Alignment: Reviewers are assigned based on strict competency alignment. We typically avoid assigning reviewers solely based on their track record in high-reputation journals if their specific expertise does not match the manuscript's topic, as mismatched expertise often leads to suboptimal evaluation quality.