Publication Process

Jurnal Inovasi Pajak Indonesia (JIPI)

Here is the Publication Process section, professionally structured to meet standards:

Publication Process

Jurnal Inovasi Pajak Indonesia (JIPI) follows a rigorous peer-reviewed publication process to ensure the highest quality and integrity of published research. The workflow involves several critical stages, including submission, review, editing, and final publication, all managed through the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform to ensure transparency, efficiency, and accessibility.

1. Manuscript Submission

Authors must submit their manuscripts through the OJS submission system. The submitted work must comply with JIPI’s author guidelines, including formatting, referencing, and ethical considerations. Key requirements for submission include:

  • Original, unpublished work with a Turnitin similarity score below 12%
  • Proper citation format using Mendeley Desktop (APA 7th edition)
  • A structured abstract (including objectives, methods, results, and conclusions)
  • Ethical clearance for research involving human subjects
  • Disclosure of any conflicts of interest

2. Initial Editorial Screening

After submission, the editorial board performs a preliminary evaluation to ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal’s scope and quality standards. This includes:

  • Checking for plagiarism using Turnitin
  • Evaluating clarity, originality, and academic relevance
  • Ensuring compliance with formatting and referencing guidelines
  • Verifying the inclusion of necessary ethical approvals

Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements are returned to the authors for revision or rejected outright.

3. Double-Blind Peer Review

Eligible manuscripts proceed to the double-blind peer review process, where at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the subject area evaluate the manuscript. Reviewers assess:

  • Originality and significance of the research
  • Methodological rigor and data validity
  • Relevance and impact of the findings
  • Clarity and coherence of the discussion

The review process follows COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines and is completed within 4-6 weeks. Based on reviewers' feedback, the manuscript may be:

  • Accepted without changes
  • Accepted with minor revisions
  • Accepted with major revisions (resubmission required)
  • Rejected due to critical issues

4. Revision and Resubmission

Authors receiving revision requests must submit a revised manuscript within 14-21 days. A detailed response letter addressing each reviewer's comment must be included. The revised submission undergoes further evaluation by the handling editor and, if necessary, a second round of peer review.

5. Final Editorial Decision

The editorial team makes the final decision based on:

  • Reviewer comments and recommendations
  • Quality of revisions
  • Compliance with JIPI’s academic and ethical standards

Manuscripts that meet all requirements are approved for publication, while those with unresolved issues may be rejected or sent for further revisions.

6. Copyediting and Proofreading

Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting to correct grammar, formatting, and consistency. Authors receive a proof version for final approval before publication. Any last-minute changes must be communicated within 48 hours of receiving the proof.

7. Publication and Archiving

Once finalized, the article is published in the latest issue of JIPI and assigned a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) through CrossRef. To ensure long-term accessibility and preservation, all published articles are archived in:

  • Institutional Repositories
  • LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe)
  • Portico (long-term digital preservation)
  • NELITI (Indonesian research repository)
  • OJS System (primary access point for readers and researchers)

8. Indexing and Dissemination

JIPI aims for wide dissemination and visibility through a periodical process for indexing purposes in international DataBASE. Authors are encouraged to share their published articles on academic networking platforms such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, and ORCID to maximise research impact.

9. Post-Publication Ethics and Corrections

JIPI adheres to a strict post-publication policy to handle any ethical concerns or errors identified after publication. This includes:

  • Corrections for minor errors (spelling, formatting)
  • Retractions for serious ethical violations (e.g., plagiarism, data falsification)
  • Editorial notices for transparency regarding significant post-publication updates

The structured publication process at JIPI ensures high-quality, ethically sound, and impactful research dissemination. By maintaining rigorous standards and utilizing advanced digital archiving systems (OJS, LOCKSS, Portico, and institutional repositories), JIPI guarantees accessibility, integrity, and long-term preservation of scholarly contributions.