Reconfiguring Tax Sovereignty under the OECD Two-Pillar Framework: Legal and Institutional Readiness in a Developing Economy

Crossmark

Click to verify publication status

Authors

  • Heriantonius Silalahi a. Departement Of Economic and Business, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia, 40257

Keywords:

International Taxation, Fiscal Sovereignty, Tax governance, OECD framework, Tax readiness

Abstract

Purpose – This article looks at how developing countries deal with the OECD's two-pillar international tax framework while protecting their own taxing abilities.

Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative, normative, juridical, and comparative policy-analytical method guides the study. Domestic tax laws, international tax treaties, and institutional arrangements are examined through doctrinal and comparative legal analysis to determine the country's preparedness for implementing the new global tax architecture.

Findings – The findings show that readiness for the two-pillar framework is not black and white, or homogeneous, but rather incremental. The pace of legal transplants and administrative capacity development varies; sovereign concerns strongly influence the sequence of reform. Rather than being a form of opposition to global coordination, partial alignment seems to be a deliberate tactic for negotiating the institutional constraints and distributive risks that are part and parcel of the process of harmonising international taxes.

Originality/value – The paper contributes to the concept of adaptive fiscal sovereignty, showing that readiness for global tax reform is emergent rather than being solely an end-point in compliance. The text is among the first to take a thorough look at the connection between legal preparedness, administrative capacity and sovereign jurisdiction in the OECD's two-pillar approach.

Research Implications – The results expand the existing literature on international tax governance by offering a new interpretation of readiness for implementation as a tactical policy option. Academic researchers and policymakers interested in fair processes for incorporating international tax norms within developing countries can find valuable insights here.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Heriantonius Silalahi, a. Departement Of Economic and Business, Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia, 40257

    Heriantonius Silalahi is a faculty member in the Department of Economics and Business at Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia. His academic interests focus on international taxation, public finance, fiscal sovereignty, and global tax governance. His research particularly examines the interaction between domestic tax systems and international tax frameworks, including OECD-led reforms, tax treaties, and developing-country perspectives. He has a strong interest in normative–juridical and policy-oriented analysis, with emphasis on institutional readiness, tax jurisdiction, and the implications of global tax harmonization for emerging economies. His work contributes to scholarly and policy discussions on equitable and sustainable international tax systems.

References

Basri, M. C., Felix, M., Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2021). Tax Administration versus Tax Rates: Evidence from Corporate Taxation in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 111(12), 3827 – 3871. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201237

Brauner, Y. (2022). Agreement? What Agreement? The 8 October 2021 OECD Statement in Perspective. Intertax, 50(1), 2–6.

Cadestin, C. (2018). Multinational enterprises and global value chains: The OECD analytical AMNE database. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Chen, H. , & D. P. (2021). Tax enforcement and taxpayer reporting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 467–506.

James, S. (2014). Tax and Non-Tax Incentives and Investments: Evidence and Policy Implications. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2401905

Nguyen-Thi-Huong, L., Nguyen-Viet, H., Nguyen-Phuong, A., & Van Nguyen, D. (2023). How does digital transformation impact bank performance? Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2217582

Akita, T., Riadi, A. A., & Rizal, A. (2021). Fiscal disparities in Indonesia in the decentralization era: Does general allocation fund equalize fiscal revenues? Regional Science Policy and Practice, 13(6), 1842 – 1865. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12326

Alshabibi, B., Pria, S., & Hussainey, K. (2022). Nationality Diversity in Corporate Boards and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Oman. Administrative Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030111

Anaman, K. A., Atzeni, M. G., Mayer, D. G., & Walthall, J. C. (1994). Economic assessment of preparedness strategies to prevent the introduction or the permanent establishment of screwworm fly in Australia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 20(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(94)90110-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(94)90110-4

Arginelli, P. (2022). The Relevance and Limits of Taxation as an Aid to Foster Megaprojects. In F. Cantoni & E. Favari (Eds.), Sustainability and Megaproject Development (pp. 89–110). Giappichelli. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003305750-7

Arginelli Paolo and Reboli, F. (2023). Pillar Two and Tax Competition: What is the Future of Tax Incentives? In F. Favari Edoardo and Cantoni (Ed.), Complexity and Sustainability in Megaprojects (pp. 177–202). Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30879-6_14

Barwick, T. (n.d.). Global Minimum Tax Reform and the Future of Tax Competition. www.oecd.org/tax/beps/new-re

Basri, M. C., Felix, M., Hanna, R., & Olken, B. A. (2021). Tax Administration versus Tax Rates: Evidence from Corporate Taxation in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 111(12), 3827 – 3871. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201237

Beer, S., Mooij, R., & Liu, L. (2020). International corporate tax avoidance: A review of the channels, magnitudes and blind spots. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12305

Brauner, Y. (2022). Agreement? What Agreement? The 8 October 2021 OECD Statement in Perspective. Intertax, 50(1), 2–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2022001

Brown, M. , & D. S. (2022). Tax evasion and inequality: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Economic Inequality, 32(1), 56–73.

Budina, N., Ebeke, C. H., Jaumotte, F., Medici, A., Panton, A. J., Tavares, M. M., & Yao, B. (2023). Structural Reforms to Accelerate Growth, Ease Policy Trade-offs, and Support the Green Transition in Emerging Market and Developing Economies. Staff Discussion Notes, 2023(007), A001. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400250095.006.A001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400250095.006

Cadestin, C. (2018). Multinational enterprises and global value chains: The OECD analytical AMNE database. OECD Publishing, Paris.

Chen, H. , & D. P. (2021). Tax enforcement and taxpayer reporting behavior: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 467–506.

Cipollini, C. (2020). GloBE proposal and possible carve-outs: is there a future for preferential tax regimes? World Tax J, 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/x009yd

Devereux, M. P., Vella, J., & Wardell-Burrus, H. (2022). Pillar 2: Rule Order Incentives and Tax Competition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4009002

Dietsch, P., & Rixen, T. (2024). Dimensions of Global Justice in Taxing Multinationals. Moral Philosophy and Politics, 11(2), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2023-0062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2023-0062

Dilaga, T. P., & Daryatno, A. B. (2025). Global Minimum Tax: Implications and Recommendations for Multinational Corporations. JRSSEM, 05(04). DOI: https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v5i4.1169

Dourado, A. P. (2018). Digital taxation opens the Pandora box: the OECD interim report and the European commission proposals. Intertax, 46. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2018058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2018058

Dourado, A. P. (2020). The global anti-base erosion proposal (GloBE) in pillar II. Intertax, 48. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2020014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2020014

Eldomiaty, T. I., Apaydin, M., El-Sehwagy, A., & Rashwan, M. H. (2023). Institutional quality and firm-level financial performance: implications from G8 and MENA Countries. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2220249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2220249

Ferreira Liotti, B. (2022). Limits of international cooperation: the concept of “jurisdiction not to tax” from the BEPS project to GloBE. Bull Int Tax, 76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/240km9w

Fizzanty, T. (2024). Digitalization of Indonesian MSMEs: Innovation Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 13–28). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0029-5_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0029-5_2

Fund, I. Monetary. (2022). World Economic Outlook, October 2022 : Countering the Cost-of-Living Crisis. International Monetary Fund.

Garcia-Bernardo, J., Janský, P., & Tørsløv, T. (2021). Multinational corporations and tax havens: evidence from country-by-country reporting. International Tax and Public Finance, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-020-09639-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-020-09639-w

Hanappi, T., & González Cabral, A. C. (2022). The impact of the international tax reforms under Pillar One and Pillar Two on MNE’s investment costs. International Tax and Public Finance, 29(6), 1495–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-022-09750-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-022-09750-0

Huizinga, H., & Laeven, L. (2008). International profit shifting within multinationals: A multi-country perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2007.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.002

Imf. (2023). INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE TAX REFORM. http://www.imf.org/external/pp/ppindex.aspx

James, S. (2013). Effectiveness of Tax and Non-Tax Incentives and Investments: Evidence and Policy Implications. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2401905

James, S. (2014). Tax and Non-Tax Incentives and Investments: Evidence and Policy Implications. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2401905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2401905

Johannesen, N. (2022a). The global minimum tax. Journal of Public Economics, 212, 104709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104709

Johannesen, N. (2022b). The global minimum tax. Journal of Public Economics, 212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104709 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104709

Keen, M., Liu, L., & Pallan, H. (2023). International Tax Spillovers and Tangible Investment, With Implications for the Global Minimum Tax, WP/23/159, August 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400248719.001

Klemm, A., Liu, L., Bartolini, D., De Mooij, R., Gaspar, V., Hebous, S., Hillier, C., Maggi, C., & Toro, J. (2019). The Impact of Profit Shifting on Economic Activity and Tax Competition The Impact of Profit Shifting on Economic Activity and Tax Competition We are grateful for comments. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513519890.001

Kurian, A. (2022). The evolution of international tax regime and the OECD Two-Pillar solution: Analysis from a developing country perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 1.

Listyawati, I., & Nurlaela, L. (n.d.). Tax Governance in the Era of Pillar Two: Legal Certainty, Risk Management, and Strategic Responses in Indonesia. Summa: Journal of Accounting and Tax, 3(2), 126–136. https://journal.idscipub.com/summa DOI: https://doi.org/10.61978/summa.v3i2.888

Meier, S., Rodriguez Gonzalez, M., & Kunze, F. (2021). The global financial crisis, the EMU sovereign debt crisis and international financial regulation: lessons from a systematic literature review. International Review of Law and Economics, 65, 105945. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105945

Nguyen-Thi-Huong, L., Nguyen-Viet, H., Nguyen-Phuong, A., & Van Nguyen, D. (2023). How does digital transformation impact bank performance? Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2217582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2217582

OECD. (2020). Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Report on Pillar Two Blueprint: Inclusive Framework on BEPS. https://doi.org/10.1787/abb4c3d1-en

Oecd. (2023). Tax Challenges Arising from the Digitalisation of the Economy-Administrative Guidance on the Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two) Inclusive Framework on BEPS PUBE. www.oecd.org/termsandconditions.

OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2023 Issue 1 (Vol. 2023). (2023). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ce188438-en

Pang, Y. (2022). A theory of fiscal policy response to an epidemic. Health Economics (United Kingdom), 31(9), 2050–2071. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4564

Perry, V. J. (2023). Pillar 2: Tax competition in low-income countries and substance-based income exclusion. Fiscal Studies, 44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12318

Persepsi Harga, P., Produk, K., Promosi Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Konsumen Minuman Boba Pada Usaha Aus di Bangka, dan, Mampang, P., Selatan Shafira Qadrina, J., Sapta Putra, S., Digdowiseiso, K., Ekonomi dan Bisnis, F., & Nasional, U. (2023). The Influence of Price Perception, Product Quality, and Promotions on Consumer Purchasing Decisions for Boba Drinks in Aus Business in Bangka, Pela Mampang, South Jakarta. In Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (Vol. 4, Issue 6). http://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/msej

Rixen, T., & Unger, B. (2022). Taxation: A Regulatory Multilevel Governance Perspective. Regulation and Governance, 16(3), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12425

Ryou, J. W., Tsang, A., & Wang, K. T. (2022). Product Market Competition and Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(2), 1215–1259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12748

Sarhan, A. A., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Elkhashen, E. M. (2024). Corruption prevention practices and tax avoidance: The moderating effect of corporate board characteristics. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 55, 100615. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100615

Schjelderup, G., & Stähler, F. (2024). The economics of the global minimum tax. International Tax and Public Finance, 31(4), 935–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09794-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-023-09794-w

Souguir, Z., Lassoued, N., Khanchel, I., & Bejaoui, E. (2025). Behind the Screens: Digital Transformation and Tax Policy. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18070390 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18070390

Spengel, C., Stage, B., & Steinbrenner, D. (2022). R&D tax incentive regimes – a comparison and evaluation of current country practices. World Tax J., 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59403/14m3kef

Sugeng, Aidy, W. R., & Cardenas, A. (2025). Digital Taxation on Over-The-Top Services: A Comparative Study of Regulations in Indonesia and the ASEAN Region. Media Iuris, 8(2), 331–370. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v8i2.71267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v8i2.71267

Susilowati, A., & Mappanyukki, R. (2024). The Impact of Digital Taxation Implementation and Taxpayer Knowledge on Tax Revenue Obstacles, Moderated by Incentive Policy. The Winners, 24(2), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v24i2.10958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v24i2.10958

Tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy–global anti-base erosion model rules (Pillar Two): Inclusive framework on BEPS. (2021). OECD.

Vicente, J. A. (2025). Tax us, if you can: a game theoretic approach to the European Union’s political impasse on a new corporate tax system. Transnational Corporations Review, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200127

Xie, K., & Huang, W. (2023). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8597326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8597326

Zhou, S., Zhou, P., & Ji, H. (2022). Can digital transformation alleviate corporate tax stickiness: The mediation effect of tax avoidance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184, 122028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122028

Published

2025-01-10

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Silalahi, H. (2025). Reconfiguring Tax Sovereignty under the OECD Two-Pillar Framework: Legal and Institutional Readiness in a Developing Economy. Jurnal Inovasi Pajak Indonesia, 1(4), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.69725/jipi.v1i4.297

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.