Impact of Auditor Independence, Professionalism, and Skepticism on Audit Quality

Devina Gunawan; Mey Ayu Lestari

doi:10.69725/aai.v1i2.193

Authors

Devina Gunawan a. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia
Mey Ayu Lestari b. Department of Accounting science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Lampung University, Lampung, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69725/aai.v1i2.193

Keywords:

Quality audit, Auditor independence, Professional skepticism, Audit tenure, Auditor competence

Abstract

Purpose – The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of auditor independence, professionalism, professional skepticism, audit tenure, and auditor competence on audit quality in Indonesia. This study is intended to provide documentation for factors that improve the reliability audits and credibility of financial reporting.
Design/methodology/approach – A quantitative method was used with the primary data in the form of structured questionnaires to auditors of Public Accounting Firms in Surabaya and other cities in Indonesia. Data were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) to confirm hypotheses and evaluate the relationships found among the variables. Tests of reliability and validity were performed to ensure accuracy of measurement.
Findings – This study found that auditor independence, professionalism, professional skepticism, and auditor competence positively and significantly affected audit quality, suggesting that ethical and technical excellence is essential to good audit practices. Conversely, audit tenure has a negative impact on audit quality, which supports the idea that tenure may impair the objectivity of auditors in an extended audit engagement. These results are consistent with regulatory arguments calling for rotation of audit firms and/or partners to bolster professional skepticism and independence.
Originality/value – This study fills a gap in the existing literature by providing empirical evidence about the determinants affecting audit quality in the Indonesian setting. The outcomes support policymakers, regulatory agencies, and auditing professionals in reinforcing governance frameworks and audit standards. The study emphasizes the significant role that auditor expertise and ethical behavior plays in upholding the integrity of financial reporting.
Research Implications – This study highlights the importance of continuing professional education, and taking action to ensure regulatory compliance, ultimately improving audit quality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Devina Gunawan, a. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta, Indonesia

Devina Gunawan SE., M.Ak
Mey Ayu Lestari, b. Department of Accounting science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Lampung University, Lampung, Indonesia.

Mey Ayu Lestari., S.Ak., M.Ak.,

References

Adams, Tom, Jagan Krishnan, and Jayanthi Krishnan. 2021. “Client Influence and Auditor Independence Revisited: Evidence from Auditor Resignations.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 40(5):106846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106846

Akuffo, Jonas Abraham. 2020. “Corporate Governance Development: A Reaction or Deliberate Policy Thought? BT - Corporate Governance and Accountability of Financial Institutions: The Power and Illusion of Quality Corporate Disclosure.” Pp. 7–34 in, edited by J. A. Akuffo. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64046-0_2

Alhababsah, Salem, and Alaa Alhaj-Ismail. 2023. “Does Shared Tenure between Audit Committee Chair and Engagement Partner Affect Audit Outcomes? Evidence from the UK.” The British Accounting Review 55(2):101067. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101067

Alhababsah, Salem, and Sina Yekini. 2021. “Audit Committee and Audit Quality: An Empirical Analysis Considering Industry Expertise, Legal Expertise and Gender Diversity.” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 42:100377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100377

Badpa, Behrooz, Omid Pourheidari, Ahmad Khodamipour, and Venkataraman Iyer. 2024. “Investigating the Effect of Audit Evidence Weighting on Auditor Objectivity.” Pp. 1–24 in Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research Volume 28. Vol. 28, Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research, edited by K. E. Karim. Emerald Publishing Limited. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-148820240000028001

Balboula, Mohamed Zaki, and Eman Elsayed Elfar. 2023. “The Impact of Partner Perfectionism on Audit Quality: The Mediating Role of Professional Skepticism in the Egyptian Context.” Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JFRA-06-2023-0296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-06-2023-0296

Bérubé, Janie, and Yves Gendron. 2023. “Developing Ethical Sensitivity in Future Accounting Practitioners: The Case of a Dialogic Learning for Final-Year Undergraduates.” Journal of Business Ethics 183(3):763–81. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04947-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04947-5

Christ, Margaret H., Marc Eulerich, Ronja Krane, and David A. Wood. 2021. “New Frontiers for Internal Audit Research*.” Accounting Perspectives 20(4):449–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12272

DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth. 1981. “Auditor Size and Audit Quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3):183–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

DeZoort, F. Todd, and Troy J. Pollard. 2023. “An Evaluation of Root Cause Analysis Use by Internal Auditors.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 42(3):107081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107081

Fakhfakh, Imen, and Anis Jarboui. 2020. “Audit Certification, Earnings Management and Risk Governance: A Moderated-Mediation Analysis.” Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 18(2):277–99. doi: 10.1108/JFRA-01-2019-0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2019-0015

Harber, Michael, Warren Maroun, and Alan Duboisée de Ricquebourg. 2023. “Audit Firm Executives under Pressure: A Discursive Analysis of Legitimisation and Resistance to Reform.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 97:102580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102580

Harber, Michael, Ben Marx, and Phillip De Jager. 2020. “The Perceived Financial Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation.” Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 31(2):215–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12115

Ho, John Kong Shan. 2022. “Strengthening Internal Controls of Listed Companies in the United Kingdom: Lessons and Experiences from the United States.” Common Law World Review 51(3):172–97. doi: 10.1177/14737795221116398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795221116398

Hoos, Florian, Jorien Louise Pruijssers, and Michel W. Lander. 2019. “Who’s Watching? Accountability in Different Audit Regimes and the Effects on Auditors’ Professional Skepticism.” Journal of Business Ethics 156(2):563–75. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3603-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3603-6

Imen, Fakhfakh, and Jarboui Anis. 2021. “The Moderating Role of Audit Quality on the Relationship between Auditor Reporting and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence from Tunisia.” EuroMed Journal of Business 16(4):416–30. doi: 10.1108/EMJB-03-2020-0024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2020-0024

Ishaque, Maria. 2021. “Managing Conflict of Interests in Professional Accounting Firms: A Research Synthesis.” Journal of Business Ethics 169(3):537–55. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04284-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04284-8

Islam, Manirul, John Slof, and Khaldoon Albitar. 2023. “The Mediation Effect of Audit Committee Quality and Internal Audit Function Quality on the Firm Size–Financial Reporting Quality Nexus.” Journal of Applied Accounting Research 24(5):839–58. doi: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0153

Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 2019. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership 77–132. doi: 10.4159/9780674274051-006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674274051-006

Jia, Jing, Zhongtian Li, and Lois Munro. 2019. “Risk Management Committee and Risk Management Disclosure: Evidence from Australia.” Pacific Accounting Review 31(3):438–61. doi: 10.1108/PAR-11-2018-0097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-11-2018-0097

de Jong, Bas, Steven Hijink, and Lars in ’t Veld. 2020. “Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation for Listed Companies: The Effects in the Netherlands.” European Business Organization Law Review 21(4):937–66. doi: 10.1007/s40804-020-00193-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00193-w

Kaptein, Muel. 2023. “Ethics Audit BT - Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics.” Pp. 819–22 in, edited by D. C. Poff and A. C. Michalos. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_67

Khan, Mohammad Jahanzeb, and Eddie Oczkowski. 2021. “The Link between Trait and State Professional Skepticism: A Review of the Literature and a Meta-Regression Analysis.” International Journal of Auditing 25(2):558–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12232

Krane, Ronja, and Marc Eulerich. 2020. “Going Global: Factors Influencing the Internationalization of the Internal Audit Function.” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 41:100353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2020.100353

Lennox, Clive, and Joanna Shuang Wu. 2022. “A Review of China-Related Accounting Research in the Past 25 Years.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 74(2):101539. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101539

Martinov-Bennie, Nonna, Maria Cadiz Dyball, and Dale Tweedie. 2022. “Professional Skepticism through Audit Praxis: An Aristotelian Perspective.” International Journal of Auditing 26(2):193–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12258

Mihret, Dessalegn Getie, Monika Kansal, Mohammad Badrul Muttakin, and Tarek Rana. 2022. “The Auditing Profession and the Key Audit Matter Reporting Requirement.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 19(1):107–25. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2020-0033

Nolder, Christine J., and Kathryn Kadous. 2018. “Grounding the Professional Skepticism Construct in Mindset and Attitude Theory: A Way Forward.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 67:1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010

Ravenscroft, Sue, and Paul F. Williams. 2021. “Sustaining Discreditable Accounting Research through Ignorance: The Mainstream Elite’s Response to the 2008 Financial Crisis.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 95:101280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101280

Schuster, Tiffany D. 2021. “Auditor Inability to Use Professional Skepticism.” Liberty University, School of Business. (December):1–216.

Al Shehab, Noor Aamer. 2022. “Under the COVID Pandemic: Is It the Springtime for Forensic Accounting Field to Blossom? BT - Artificial Intelligence and COVID Effect on Accounting.” Pp. 11–32 in, edited by B. Alareeni and A. Hamdan. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1036-4_2

Smith, Kecia Williams. 2023. “Tell Me More: A Content Analysis of Expanded Auditor Reporting in the United Kingdom.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 108:101456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101456

Taha, Alaa A. D. 2024. “Internal Auditors’ Independence under Workplace Bullying Stress: An Investigative Study.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 15(5):762–83. doi: 10.1108/JIABR-09-2022-0239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2022-0239

Westermann, Kimberly D., Jeffrey Cohen, and Greg Trompeter. 2019. “PCAOB Inspections: Public Accounting Firms on ‘Trial.’” Contemporary Accounting Research 36(2):694–731. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12454

White, Jeremy N. 2023. Make Better Strategic Decisions: How to Develop Robust Decision-Making to Avoid Organisational Disasters. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003457398

Xu, Gina, and Steven Dellaportas. 2021. “Challenges to Professional Independence in a Relational Society: Accountants in China.” Journal of Business Ethics 168(2):415–29. doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04249-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04249-x

Yousefi Nejad, Maryam, Ahmed Sarwar Khan, and Jaizah Othman. 2024. “A Panel Data Analysis of the Effect of Audit Quality on Financial Statement Fraud.” Asian Journal of Accounting Research 9(4):422–45. doi: 10.1108/AJAR-04-2023-0112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-04-2023-0112