Green Accounting and Governance for Advancing Sustainable Village Development
Keywords:
Participatory governance, Institutional capacity, Sustainable development, Environmental accounting, Public-sector reformAbstract
Objective: This paper seeks to gain an understanding of the integration of institutional capacity, collective awareness, regulatory behavior, conservation accounting activities and participatory participation on sustainable development in public sector governance systems.
Methods: Quantitative structural modeling was used to investigate interrelations between governance constructs with careful tests of measure validity, structural paths, and indirect effects. The analytical approach has strong robustness and reliability, with extensive methodological examination, discrimination measures, and iterative model validation.
Results: Participatory engagement is the most important factor for the predictions of sustainability results, illuminating its fate, strengthening responsiveness, shared ownership, and social legitimacy. Institutional capacity demonstrates high direct and indirect contributions, illustrating that managerial consistency, administrative competence, and integrated actions are the conditional base for sustainable development. AS only affects SD through active participation in the former and internal decision transparency for EA. Regulating behaviour supports sustainability primarily by its capacity to entrench the dynamics of engagement.
Novelty: The paper develops a governance-participation integrative model, which represents an alternative to traditional compliance- and accounting-based explanations. It shows that sustainable development is driven more by institutional capacity and social embeddedness than technical systems per se, generating a new theoretical way of thinking for public sector sustainability research.
Research Implications: Implications favour reforms that strengthen institutional capacity, broaden participation venues, and integrate environmental accounting into strategic governance processes. The theoretical framework presented here promotes a prospective approach to developing ‘inclusive and resilient’ sustainability policies.
Downloads
References
Ayambire, R. A., Rytwinski, T., Taylor, J. J., Luizza, M. W., Muir, M. J., Cadet, C., Armitage, D., Bennett, N. J., Brooks, J., Cheng, S. H., Martinez, J., Nagendran, M., Öckerman, S., Rivera, S. N., Savage, A., Wilkie, D. S., Cooke, S. J., & Bennett, J. R. (2025). Challenges in assessing the effects of environmental governance systems on conservation outcomes. Conservation Biology, 39(1), e14392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14392
Cappellieri, F., Lombardi, R., Pizzo, M., & Vinciguerra, R. (2025). Environmental reporting in public sector organizations: A review of literature for the future paths of research. Financial Accountability & Management, 41(1), 159–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12411
Hu, Y., Dong, Y., & Paraman, P. (2025). Environmental responsibility governance: Local environmental legislation influence on corporate environmental investment decisions. Finance Research Letters, 79, 107250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107250
Kaddoura, S., Hijazi, R., Dahmani, N., & Nassar, R. (2025). Stimulating Environmental and Health Protection Through Utilizing Statistical Methods for Climate Resilience and Policy Integration. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 22, Issue 3, p. 331). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030331
Lei, X., Wang, H., Deng, F., Li, S., & Chang, W. (2025). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 2451–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02106-5
Lema, M. W. (2025). Sustaining Rural Livelihoods Through Participatory Water Governance: A Review of Community-Driven Water Resource Management Models in East and Central Africa. Environmental Quality Management, 34(3), e70023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70023
Ma, L., Ali, A., Shahzad, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Factors of green innovation: the role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes, 54(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0911
Martins Costa Moreira, R., & Wedy, G. (2025). Administrative Tools for Environmental Regulation BT - Brazilian Environmental and Climate Change Law (R. Martins Costa Moreira & G. Wedy (eds.); pp. 75–112). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87998-2_8
Mendes, T., Teixeira, H., Lopes, A. M., & Correia, A. (2025). From environmental knowledge to pro-environmental behaviors: paving the way for more sustainable higher education institutions through a mission refocus. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(5), 2306–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10181-8
Petrie, M. (2025). Green Public Financial Management BT - Contemporary Issues and Challenges in Public Financial Management: Responding to Global Crises (R. Allen & P. Krause (eds.); pp. 269–314). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81136-4_9
Ribeiro, M. A., Seyfi, S., Elhoushy, S., Woosnam, K. M., & Patwardhan, V. (2025). Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: the moderating role of green consumption values. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(6), 1079–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2230389
Sun, J., Zheng, L., & Zhan, M. (2025). New path to green transformation: Exploring the impact of corporate governance on environmental information disclosure quality of new energy companies. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123789
Tiwari, C., & Rani, M. (2025). Where the Wild Things Are: Identifying the Factors Behind and Mitigation Measures for Biodiversity Conservation Crisis in Himalayas BT - People and Mountain Environments: Interconnectedness for Sustainable Development in the Himalayas (A. Borthakur & P. Singh (eds.); pp. 247–286). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83553-7_8
Uyan, Ö. (2025). Green Transition of Global Trade: Opportunities and Policy Frameworks in Clean Energy Trade TT - Küresel Ticaretin Yeşil Dönüşümü: Temiz Enerji Ticareti Fırsatları ve Politika Düzenlemeleri. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 8(3), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1777719
Xiufan, Z., & Yunqiao, L. L. (2025). CIO leadership, employee digital ability, and corporate green innovation performance–moderating effect of organizational agility and environmental culture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(10), 24585–24628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05581-7
Zhao, R., Mou, Y., & Yu, X. (2025). Analysis of the moderating effects of environmental regulations on green accounting information disclosure and financial performance of heavily polluting enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106493
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dio Rizka, Rahmawati (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Advances in Accounting Innovation (AAI) © 2024 by Inovasi Analisis Data is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0







