Reviewer Guide
Reviewer Guide for Advances in Management Innovation (AMI)
1. Introduction
Thank you for agreeing to review for Advances in Management Innovation (AMI). Your expertise and insights are crucial in maintaining the high standards of our journal. The following guidelines are designed to assist you in evaluating submissions effectively.
2. Reviewer Responsibilities
As a reviewer for AMI, your primary responsibilities include:
- Assessing the originality, significance, and methodological rigor of the manuscript.
- Providing constructive feedback to help authors improve their work.
- Ensuring that the manuscript aligns with the scope and standards of AMI.
- Upholding confidentiality and ethical standards throughout the review process.
3. Evaluation Criteria
Please consider the following criteria when evaluating manuscripts:
- Originality and Innovation: Assess the novelty and innovativeness of the research.
- Significance: Evaluate the potential impact of the findings on the field of management.
- Methodology: Review the appropriateness, clarity, and rigor of the research methods.
- Clarity and Organization: Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and organization of the manuscript.
- References: Assess the adequacy and appropriateness of the references cited.
4. Review Process
- Initial Screening: Evaluate the manuscript’s suitability for AMI based on the scope and quality.
- Detailed Review: Provide a detailed critique addressing strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement.
- Recommendation: Recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on your assessment.
- Confidentiality: Maintain confidentiality about the manuscript and refrain from discussing its content with others.
5. Submission
Please submit your review via the AMI manuscript submission system within the specified timeline. If you require an extension or encounter any issues, please contact the editorial office promptly.
Thank you for your commitment to advancing research in management through AMI. Your contributions are invaluable to the scholarly community.
This reviewer guide aims to provide a structured approach for evaluating submissions to Advances in Management Innovation (AMI), ensuring rigorous and fair peer review processes.