Technology Acceptance Model and Corporate Governance: Reducing Fraud in E-Reimbursement Systems

Authors

  • Careyi F a. Department of Accounting, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
  • Croskey Garce b. Department of Management, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia
  • Chen S c. Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69725/jebi.v1i1.172

Keywords:

E-reimbursement systems, Brand Trust, corporate governance, Disclosure intentions, Structural equation modeling

Abstract

Purpose: Drawing on the context of Australia, this research investigates the complex interplay of corporate governance, trust in e-reimbursement systems, and employee intention to truthfully disclose information.
Method: Using an online quantitative survey designed for Australian staff members who utilize e-reimbursement systems, the study investigates how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived security, and corporate governance affect trust and disclosure intention through structural equation modeling.
Findings: To this end, the study reveals the role of several factors related to corporate governance influencing trust and unethical behavior in e-reimbursement.” The governance structures in place that ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct go a long way in establishing trust in these systems. The results indicate that having a corporate governance framework can create an environment where employees are comfortable with their disclosures and instill them with honesty and integrity.
Novelty: This study advances the literature by integrating the concepts of technology adoption, corporate governance and ethics in the digital age. Through this novel theoretical insight, the study explores how governance mechanisms could moderate the relationship between trust in e-reimbursement systems and the intention to share (or not share) information, providing a new lens to understand how traditional views on organizational behavior can be expanded through the lens of theory.
Implications: The study's implications are significant for leading organizations in Australia and worldwide. It highlights the need for strong corporate governance frameworks that are in place alongside digital transformation efforts to ensure employees feel safe and incentivized to disclose any information in good faith. In addition, the results imply that future studies should investigate long-term studies that follow employee behaviour over time as governance and technologies evolve

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Careyi F, a. Department of Accounting, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

    Careyi Farnets., CFA, Ph.D

    Department of Accounting, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

  • Croskey Garce, b. Department of Management, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

    Croskey Garce., PhD

    Department of Management, Economic Business, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

  • Chen S, c. Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA

    Chen Smiht

    Gies College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA

References

Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. (2016). Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 90–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007

Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014

Alawattage, C., Graham, C., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2019). Microaccountability and biopolitics: Microfinance in a Sri Lankan village. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 38–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.008

Albahri, A. S., Duhaim, A. M., Fadhel, M. A., Alnoor, A., Baqer, N. S., Alzubaidi, L., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Bai, J., Salhi, A., Santamaría, J., Ouyang, C., Gupta, A., Gu, Y., & Deveci, M. (2023). A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion, 96, 156–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008

Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423

Banna, H., Mia, M. A., Nourani, M., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). Fintech-based Financial Inclusion and Risk-taking of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102149

Boddy, C. R., Freeman, C., & Karpacheva-Hock, E. (2024). Fraud and corporate psychopaths: The proposition for reintroducing personality traits of the economic crime offender. Journal of Economic Criminology, 5, 100081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100081

Chang, V., Baudier, P., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, J., & Arami, M. (2020). How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166

Chen, R. R., Chen, K., & Ou, C. X. J. (2023). Facilitating interorganizational trust in strategic alliances by leveraging blockchain-based systems: Case studies of two eastern banks. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102521

El Barachi, M., Salim, T. A., Nyadzayo, M. W., Mathew, S., Badewi, A., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2022). The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort. Technology in Society, 71, 102115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102115

Hassan, A., Bhatti, S. H., Shujaat, S., & Hwang, Y. (2022). To adopt or not to adopt? The determinants of cloud computing adoption in information technology sector. Decision Analytics Journal, 5, 100138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100138

Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553

Kassem, R. (2022). Elucidating corporate governance’s impact and role in countering fraud. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1523–1546. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0279

Kose, I., Gokturk, M., & Kilic, K. (2015). An interactive machine-learning-based electronic fraud and abuse detection system in healthcare insurance. Applied Soft Computing, 36, 283–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.018

Lee, J.-E. R., Rao, S., Nass, C., Forssell, K., & John, J. M. (2012). When do online shoppers appreciate security enhancement efforts? Effects of financial risk and security level on evaluations of customer authentication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(5), 364–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.12.002

Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751

Orsini, L. S., Berger, M., Crown, W., Daniel, G., Eichler, H.-G., Goettsch, W., Graff, J., Guerino, J., Jonsson, P., Lederer, N. M., Monz, B., Mullins, C. D., Schneeweiss, S., Brunt, D. Van, Wang, S. V, & Willke, R. J. (2020). Improving Transparency to Build Trust in Real-World Secondary Data Studies for Hypothesis Testing—Why, What, and How: Recommendations and a Road Map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative. Value in Health, 23(9), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002

Vila, N., & Kuster, I. (2011). Consumer feelings and behaviours towards well designed websites. Information & Management, 48(4), 166–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.04.003

Villagrana, K. M., Carver, A. T., Holley, L. C., Ogbonnaya, I. N., Stott, T., Denby, R., & Ferguson, K. M. (2022). “They Show Us that We’re Important”: Facilitators of Service Utilization Among Expectant and Parenting Youth with Foster Care Histories. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 39(6), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00855-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00855-3

Wang, Y., Yu, M., & Gao, S. (2022). Gender diversity and financial statement fraud. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(2), 106903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106903

Warkentin, M., Sharma, S., Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., & Pavlou, P. (2018). Social identity and trust in internet-based voting adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007

Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028

Published

2024-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Farnets, C., Garce, C., & Smiht, C. (2024). Technology Acceptance Model and Corporate Governance: Reducing Fraud in E-Reimbursement Systems. Journal Economic Business Innovation, 1(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.69725/jebi.v1i1.172

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 26

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.