Technology Acceptance Model and Corporate Governance: Reducing Fraud in E-Reimbursement Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69725/jebi.v1i1.172
Keywords:
E-reimbursement systems, Brand Trust, corporate governance, Disclosure intentions, Structural equation modelingAbstract
Purpose: Drawing on the context of Australia, this research investigates the complex interplay of corporate governance, trust in e-reimbursement systems, and employee intention to truthfully disclose information.
Method: Using an online quantitative survey designed for Australian staff members who utilize e-reimbursement systems, the study investigates how perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived security, and corporate governance affect trust and disclosure intention through structural equation modeling.
Findings: To this end, the study reveals the role of several factors related to corporate governance influencing trust and unethical behavior in e-reimbursement.” The governance structures in place that ensure transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct go a long way in establishing trust in these systems. The results indicate that having a corporate governance framework can create an environment where employees are comfortable with their disclosures and instill them with honesty and integrity.
Novelty: This study advances the literature by integrating the concepts of technology adoption, corporate governance and ethics in the digital age. Through this novel theoretical insight, the study explores how governance mechanisms could moderate the relationship between trust in e-reimbursement systems and the intention to share (or not share) information, providing a new lens to understand how traditional views on organizational behavior can be expanded through the lens of theory.
Implications: The study's implications are significant for leading organizations in Australia and worldwide. It highlights the need for strong corporate governance frameworks that are in place alongside digital transformation efforts to ensure employees feel safe and incentivized to disclose any information in good faith. In addition, the results imply that future studies should investigate long-term studies that follow employee behaviour over time as governance and technologies evolve
Downloads
References
Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. (2016). Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 90–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014
Alawattage, C., Graham, C., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2019). Microaccountability and biopolitics: Microfinance in a Sri Lankan village. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 72, 38–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.008
Albahri, A. S., Duhaim, A. M., Fadhel, M. A., Alnoor, A., Baqer, N. S., Alzubaidi, L., Albahri, O. S., Alamoodi, A. H., Bai, J., Salhi, A., Santamaría, J., Ouyang, C., Gupta, A., Gu, Y., & Deveci, M. (2023). A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion, 96, 156–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008
Alkaraan, F., Albitar, K., Hussainey, K., & Venkatesh, V. G. (2022). Corporate transformation toward Industry 4.0 and financial performance: The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121423
Banna, H., Mia, M. A., Nourani, M., & Yarovaya, L. (2022). Fintech-based Financial Inclusion and Risk-taking of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102149
Boddy, C. R., Freeman, C., & Karpacheva-Hock, E. (2024). Fraud and corporate psychopaths: The proposition for reintroducing personality traits of the economic crime offender. Journal of Economic Criminology, 5, 100081. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2024.100081
Chang, V., Baudier, P., Zhang, H., Xu, Q., Zhang, J., & Arami, M. (2020). How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 120166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120166
Chen, R. R., Chen, K., & Ou, C. X. J. (2023). Facilitating interorganizational trust in strategic alliances by leveraging blockchain-based systems: Case studies of two eastern banks. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102521. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102521
El Barachi, M., Salim, T. A., Nyadzayo, M. W., Mathew, S., Badewi, A., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2022). The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort. Technology in Society, 71, 102115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102115
Hassan, A., Bhatti, S. H., Shujaat, S., & Hwang, Y. (2022). To adopt or not to adopt? The determinants of cloud computing adoption in information technology sector. Decision Analytics Journal, 5, 100138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100138
Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553
Kassem, R. (2022). Elucidating corporate governance’s impact and role in countering fraud. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1523–1546. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0279
Kose, I., Gokturk, M., & Kilic, K. (2015). An interactive machine-learning-based electronic fraud and abuse detection system in healthcare insurance. Applied Soft Computing, 36, 283–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.018
Lee, J.-E. R., Rao, S., Nass, C., Forssell, K., & John, J. M. (2012). When do online shoppers appreciate security enhancement efforts? Effects of financial risk and security level on evaluations of customer authentication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(5), 364–376. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.12.002
Manita, R., Elommal, N., Baudier, P., & Hikkerova, L. (2020). The digital transformation of external audit and its impact on corporate governance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119751. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119751
Orsini, L. S., Berger, M., Crown, W., Daniel, G., Eichler, H.-G., Goettsch, W., Graff, J., Guerino, J., Jonsson, P., Lederer, N. M., Monz, B., Mullins, C. D., Schneeweiss, S., Brunt, D. Van, Wang, S. V, & Willke, R. J. (2020). Improving Transparency to Build Trust in Real-World Secondary Data Studies for Hypothesis Testing—Why, What, and How: Recommendations and a Road Map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative. Value in Health, 23(9), 1128–1136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.002
Vila, N., & Kuster, I. (2011). Consumer feelings and behaviours towards well designed websites. Information & Management, 48(4), 166–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.04.003
Villagrana, K. M., Carver, A. T., Holley, L. C., Ogbonnaya, I. N., Stott, T., Denby, R., & Ferguson, K. M. (2022). “They Show Us that We’re Important”: Facilitators of Service Utilization Among Expectant and Parenting Youth with Foster Care Histories. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 39(6), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00855-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-022-00855-3
Wang, Y., Yu, M., & Gao, S. (2022). Gender diversity and financial statement fraud. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 41(2), 106903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2021.106903
Warkentin, M., Sharma, S., Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., & Pavlou, P. (2018). Social identity and trust in internet-based voting adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Careyi F, Croskey Garce, Chen S (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal Economic Business Innovation (JEBI) © 2024 by Inovasi Analisis Data is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0