Green Accounting and Governance for Advancing Sustainable Village Development

Crossmark

Click to verify publication status

Authors

  • Dio Rizka Department of Accounting, Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia image/svg+xml
  • Rahmawati Department of Accounting, Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia image/svg+xml

Keywords:

Participatory governance, Institutional capacity, Sustainable development, Environmental accounting, Public-sector reform

Abstract

Objective: This paper seeks to gain an understanding of the integration of institutional capacity, collective awareness, regulatory behavior, conservation accounting activities and participatory participation on sustainable development in public sector governance systems.

Methods: Quantitative structural modeling was used to investigate interrelations between governance constructs with careful tests of measure validity, structural paths, and indirect effects. The analytical approach has strong robustness and reliability, with extensive methodological examination, discrimination measures, and iterative model validation.

Results: Participatory engagement is the most important factor for the predictions of sustainability results, illuminating its fate, strengthening responsiveness, shared ownership, and social legitimacy. Institutional capacity demonstrates high direct and indirect contributions, illustrating that managerial consistency, administrative competence, and integrated actions are the conditional base for sustainable development. AS only affects SD through active participation in the former and internal decision transparency for EA. Regulating behaviour supports sustainability primarily by its capacity to entrench the dynamics of engagement.

Novelty: The paper develops a governance-participation integrative model, which represents an alternative to traditional compliance- and accounting-based explanations. It shows that sustainable development is driven more by institutional capacity and social embeddedness than technical systems per se, generating a new theoretical way of thinking for public sector sustainability research.

Research Implications: Implications favour reforms that strengthen institutional capacity, broaden participation venues, and integrate environmental accounting into strategic governance processes. The theoretical framework presented here promotes a prospective approach to developing ‘inclusive and resilient’ sustainability policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Dio Rizka, Department of Accounting, Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

    Dio Rizka, S.E., M.Ak. is a researcher and lecturer at the Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS), Surakarta. He is the corresponding author of this scientific paper. Holding a Master's degree in Accounting, his research focuses on public sector accounting, financial accounting, or other fields relevant to the context of the article. His works can be traced through his Google Scholar profile. With his dedication to the academic world, Dio Rizka actively contributes to the development of accounting science through various publications and research activities.

  • Rahmawati, Department of Accounting, Economics and Business, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

    Prof. Dr. Rahmawati, M.Si., Ak., CA. is a Professor in the Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Sebelas Maret University (UNS), Surakarta. As an academic and certified professional, she has a very productive and internationally recognized research track record, as reflected in her Scopus Author ID and Google Scholar profiles. Her expertise spans fields such as auditing, forensic accounting, and management accounting. Her extensive experience and deep expertise have made significant contributions to both the advancement of accounting science and the development of the next generation of accountants.

References

Ayambire, R. A., Rytwinski, T., Taylor, J. J., Luizza, M. W., Muir, M. J., Cadet, C., Armitage, D., Bennett, N. J., Brooks, J., Cheng, S. H., Martinez, J., Nagendran, M., Öckerman, S., Rivera, S. N., Savage, A., Wilkie, D. S., Cooke, S. J., & Bennett, J. R. (2025). Challenges in assessing the effects of environmental governance systems on conservation outcomes. Conservation Biology, 39(1), e14392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14392

Cappellieri, F., Lombardi, R., Pizzo, M., & Vinciguerra, R. (2025). Environmental reporting in public sector organizations: A review of literature for the future paths of research. Financial Accountability & Management, 41(1), 159–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12411

Hu, Y., Dong, Y., & Paraman, P. (2025). Environmental responsibility governance: Local environmental legislation influence on corporate environmental investment decisions. Finance Research Letters, 79, 107250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107250

Kaddoura, S., Hijazi, R., Dahmani, N., & Nassar, R. (2025). Stimulating Environmental and Health Protection Through Utilizing Statistical Methods for Climate Resilience and Policy Integration. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (Vol. 22, Issue 3, p. 331). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030331

Lei, X., Wang, H., Deng, F., Li, S., & Chang, W. (2025). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainability Through Scrutiny: Enhancing Transparency in Chinese Corporations via Environmental Audits. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 2451–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02106-5

Lema, M. W. (2025). Sustaining Rural Livelihoods Through Participatory Water Governance: A Review of Community-Driven Water Resource Management Models in East and Central Africa. Environmental Quality Management, 34(3), e70023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70023

Ma, L., Ali, A., Shahzad, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Factors of green innovation: the role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes, 54(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2022-0911

Martins Costa Moreira, R., & Wedy, G. (2025). Administrative Tools for Environmental Regulation BT - Brazilian Environmental and Climate Change Law (R. Martins Costa Moreira & G. Wedy (eds.); pp. 75–112). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87998-2_8

Mendes, T., Teixeira, H., Lopes, A. M., & Correia, A. (2025). From environmental knowledge to pro-environmental behaviors: paving the way for more sustainable higher education institutions through a mission refocus. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(5), 2306–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10181-8

Petrie, M. (2025). Green Public Financial Management BT - Contemporary Issues and Challenges in Public Financial Management: Responding to Global Crises (R. Allen & P. Krause (eds.); pp. 269–314). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81136-4_9

Ribeiro, M. A., Seyfi, S., Elhoushy, S., Woosnam, K. M., & Patwardhan, V. (2025). Determinants of generation Z pro-environmental travel behaviour: the moderating role of green consumption values. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(6), 1079–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2230389

Sun, J., Zheng, L., & Zhan, M. (2025). New path to green transformation: Exploring the impact of corporate governance on environmental information disclosure quality of new energy companies. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123789. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123789

Tiwari, C., & Rani, M. (2025). Where the Wild Things Are: Identifying the Factors Behind and Mitigation Measures for Biodiversity Conservation Crisis in Himalayas BT - People and Mountain Environments: Interconnectedness for Sustainable Development in the Himalayas (A. Borthakur & P. Singh (eds.); pp. 247–286). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-83553-7_8

Uyan, Ö. (2025). Green Transition of Global Trade: Opportunities and Policy Frameworks in Clean Energy Trade TT - Küresel Ticaretin Yeşil Dönüşümü: Temiz Enerji Ticareti Fırsatları ve Politika Düzenlemeleri. Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi, 8(3), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1777719

Xiufan, Z., & Yunqiao, L. L. (2025). CIO leadership, employee digital ability, and corporate green innovation performance–moderating effect of organizational agility and environmental culture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(10), 24585–24628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05581-7

Zhao, R., Mou, Y., & Yu, X. (2025). Analysis of the moderating effects of environmental regulations on green accounting information disclosure and financial performance of heavily polluting enterprises. Finance Research Letters, 72, 106493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106493

Published

2025-08-10

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Rizka, D., & Rahmawati. (2025). Green Accounting and Governance for Advancing Sustainable Village Development. Advances in Accounting Innovation, 2(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.69725/aai.v2i1.231

Similar Articles

1-10 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.