Corporate Social Responsibility Market Reaction and Accounting Conservatism with Investor Protection and Stock Liquidity

Van Hu Zhangze; Li  Wang Y. L

doi:10.69725/aai.v1i2.199

Authors

Van Hu Zhangze a. Wenlan School of Business, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China
Li Wang Yu Liao b. School of Business Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 1160, PR China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69725/aai.v1i2.199

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Accounting Conservatism, Investor Protection, Stock Liquidities, Financial Transparency

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates the links between CSR, market response and accounting conservatism, focusing on the moderating influences of investor protection and stock liquidity. We hypothesise that active involvement in CSR initiatives tends to improve accounting conservatism and that this relationship is moderated by external governance mechanisms.
Design/methodology/approach – This study uses multi-year panel data of listed companies and applies a two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression model. To ensure robustness, several CSR proxies are examined. These include environmental, social and governance (ESG) dimensions. To address endogeneity concerns, the study controls for both firm characteristics, industry-specific effects and aggregator macro conditions.
Findings – The results show that CSR affects accounting conservatism positively, especially when in firms with effective investor protection and high stock liquidity. Companies with higher CSR engagement show less earnings management, a sign of increased accounting quality and governance. These results are stable across robustness checks as to alternative conservatism proxies and CSR components.
Originality/value – While previous studies considered CSR and conservatism separately, this study takes investor protection and stock liquidity as moderator variables, thus showing a comprehensive view of the governance role of CSR. Moreover, it uses various CSR proxies and alternative conservatism measures, providing a much more detailed and reliable analysis.
Research Implications – The research emphasises that CSR goes beyond social objectives. As a strategic tool, it is a means for companies to increase financial transparency and investor confidence. Policy makers should explore ways to further strengthen investor protection regimes to reap the governance benefits of CSR. And investors and regulators can use CSR disclosures to assess companies' financial prudence and risk management practices, thereby promoting more stable and trusted financial markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Van Hu Zhangze, a. Wenlan School of Business, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China

Van Hu Zhangze
Li Wang Yu Liao , b. School of Business Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning Province 1160, PR China

Li Wang Y. L

References

Alessi, Lucia, Elisa Ossola, and Roberto Panzica. 2021. “What Greenium Matters in the Stock Market? The Role of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Environmental Disclosures.” Journal of Financial Stability 54:100869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100869.

Alsalmi, Noora, Subhan Ullah, and Muhammad Rafique. 2023. “Accounting for Digital Currencies.” Research in International Business and Finance 64:101897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101897.

Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C., Andrianos E. Tsekrekos, and Georgios Voulgaris. 2021. “Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Social Responsibility.” The British Accounting Review 53(4):100942. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100942.

Barney, Jay B. 2018. “Why Resource-Based Theory’s Model of Profit Appropriation Must Incorporate a Stakeholder Perspective.” Strategic Management Journal 39(13):3305–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2949.

Bouteska, Ahmed. 2019. “The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Market Reactions to Financial Earnings Restatements: Lessons from the United States.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance 24:100241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2019.100241.

Dahlin, Peter, Peter Ekman, Jimmie Röndell, and Ossi Pesämaa. 2020. “Exploring the Business Logic behind CSR Certifications.” Journal of Business Research 112:521–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.046.

Dechow, Patricia M., Chad R. Larson, and Robert J. Resutek. 2022. “The Effect of Accrual Heterogeneity on Accrual Quality Inferences.” The Accounting Review 97(5):245–73. doi: 10.2308/TAR-2019-0200.

Devine, Anthony, Abdul Jabbar, Jonathan Kimmitt, and Chrysostomos Apostolidis. 2021. “Conceptualising a Social Business Blockchain: The Coexistence of Social and Economic Logics.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172:120997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120997.

Garanina, Tatiana, and Oksana Kim. 2023. “The Relationship between CSR Disclosure and Accounting Conservatism: The Role of State Ownership.” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 50:100522. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100522.

García-Sánchez, Isabel-María. 2020. “Drivers of the CSR Report Assurance Quality: Credibility and Consistency for Stakeholder Engagement.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 27(6):2530–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1974.

García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, Oscar Suárez-Fernández, and Jennifer Martínez-Ferrero. 2019. “Female Directors and Impression Management in Sustainability Reporting.” International Business Review 28(2):359–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.10.007.

Guo, Jun, Pinghsun Huang, and Yan Zhang. 2020. “Accounting Conservatism and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Advances in Accounting 51:100501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2020.100501.

Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 2019. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership 77–132. doi: 10.4159/9780674274051-006.

Konovalova, Mayya, Penelope Tuck, and Rodrigo Ormeño Pérez. 2023. “In Search of the Owner: Regulating through Transparency.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 91:102421. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102421.

Kotsantonis, Sakis, Chris Pinney, and George Serafeim. 2016. “ESG Integration in Investment Management: Myths and Realities.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 28(2):10–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169.

Parfitt, Claire. 2024. “A Foundation for ‘Ethical Capital’: The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board and Integrated Reporting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 98:102477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102477.

Peng, Jing, Yan Song, Guoping Tu, and Yanhong Liu. 2021. “A Study of the Dual-Target Corporate Environmental Behavior (DTCEB) of Heavily Polluting Enterprises under Different Environment Regulations: Green Innovation vs. Pollutant Emissions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 297:126602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126602.

Rock, Edward B. 2021. “For Whom Is the Corporation Managed in 2020? The Debate over Corporate Purpose.” The Business Lawyer 76(2):363–96.

Surroca, Jordi, Josep A. Tribó, and Sandra Waddock. 2010. “Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources.” Strategic Management Journal 31(5):463–90.

Susen, Malte, and Michael Andreas Etter. 2024. “Beyond Financial Outcomes: Assessing the Influence of ESG Tilt and Momentum on Employee Satisfaction in S&P 500 Corporations.” Academy of Management Proceedings 2024(1):15068. doi: 10.5465/AMPROC.2024.15068abstract.

Velte, Patrick. 2023. “Which Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Sustainability? A Systematic Literature Review.” Business Strategy and the Environment 32(1):42–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3117.

Wang, Xue, Feng Cao, and Kangtao Ye. 2018. “Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reporting and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment.” Journal of Business Ethics 152(1):253–74. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3296-2.

Wilson, Fiona, and James E. Post. 2013. “Business Models for People, Planet (& Profits): Exploring the Phenomena of Social Business, a Market-Based Approach to Social Value Creation.” Small Business Economics 40(3):715–37. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9401-0.