Publication Ethics
As a journal committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in academic publishing, Advances in Environmental Innovation (ANEVA) adheres strictly to the following principles of publication ethics:
-
Authorship and Originality: ANEVA insists on originality in submissions and expects authors to acknowledge all sources used in their research. Authorship should accurately reflect contributions to the study.
-
Plagiarism and Citation: Plagiarism in any form is unacceptable. Authors must ensure that all content is properly cited and attributed to the original source.
-
Peer Review Integrity: ANEVA employs a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and validity of published articles. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are expected to provide impartial and constructive feedback.
-
Conflict of Interest: Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research or publication process.
-
Data Integrity and Reproducibility: Authors should provide access to their data and methodologies to facilitate transparency and reproducibility of research findings whenever possible.
-
Publication Decisions: Editorial decisions are based solely on the academic merit and relevance of the manuscript to the journal's scope, without regard to authors' race, gender, nationality, or institutional affiliation.
-
Ethical Treatment of Subjects: Research involving human or animal subjects must comply with relevant ethical guidelines. Authors should include statements confirming ethical approval or informed consent where applicable.
-
Correction and Retraction: ANEVA is committed to correcting errors promptly and retracting articles that are found to contain misleading or erroneous information.
These principles guide ANEVA in maintaining integrity, trust, and excellence in scholarly publishing, ensuring that the journal contributes responsibly to the field of environmental innovation.
