Reviewer Guide

Reviewer Guide: Advances in Nutrition Innovation (NUTRI)

Purpose of Review: The primary aim of the review process is to ensure the quality, relevance, and originality of submissions to Advances in Nutrition Innovation (NUTRI). Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the journal's academic integrity and advancing knowledge in the field.

Review Process:

1. Double-Blind Review: Reviewers will assess the manuscript without knowledge of the authors' identities, and authors will not know the identities of the reviewers.

2. Evaluation Criteria:

   • Originality: Assess if the study presents novel findings or insights that contribute to the field of nutrition.
   • Relevance: Determine the relevance of the research to the journal's focus areas, including nutrition, physiotherapy, and public health.
   • Methodology: Evaluate the robustness and appropriateness of the research design, methods, and statistical analysis used.
   • Clarity and Structure: Check if the manuscript is well-organized, clearly written, and follows the journal’s formatting guidelines.
   • Results and Interpretation: Review if the results are presented clearly and are interpreted in the context of existing literature.
   • References: Ensure that the manuscript includes relevant and recent references to support the findings.

3. Confidentiality: Reviewers must keep all information regarding the manuscript confidential and not discuss it with others.

Reviewer's Recommendations: Reviewers should provide constructive feedback and recommendations for improvement, categorizing their comments as follows:

• Major Revisions: Significant changes required that could affect the manuscript's validity or clarity.
• Minor Revisions: Minor adjustments needed that do not fundamentally alter the manuscript.
• Accept: The manuscript meets the journal's standards and can be published as is.
• Reject: The manuscript does not meet the necessary criteria for publication.

Submission of Review: Reviewers should submit their evaluations within the designated timeframe, ensuring timely processing of the manuscript. Comments should be thorough and constructive, aimed at helping authors improve their work.

Thank You

Thank you for contributing your expertise to the peer review process and helping uphold the standards of Advances in Nutrition Innovation (NUTRI). Your insights are invaluable to the advancement of knowledge in the field.