Plagiarism

SHMW upholds the highest standards of originality and academic integrity. This policy defines plagiarism, specifies our similarity thresholds, describes screening procedures, and clarifies author responsibilities. Practices are aligned with recognized editorial standards and COPE guidance.

• Verbatim copying of text, tables, figures, or code without quotation marks and citation.
• Close/inadequate paraphrase that mirrors the source’s structure/wording without explicit attribution.
• Use of ideas, data, or results without acknowledgement or permission where required.
• Duplicate/previously published content submitted as new (any language) without transparent disclosure.

SHMW applies a maximum overall similarity of 15% (after exclusions) with a single-source cap of 3%. Manuscripts that exceed these limits are returned for revision or may be rejected.

• Prioritize peer-reviewed, reputable sources and current literature.
• Manage references with Mendeley Desktop (APA 7th) for accurate, consistent citations.
• Whenever possible, cite the primary/original source of ideas, data, and instruments.

All submissions are screened before peer review using industry-standard systems:

• Turnitin — primary similarity screening (overall ≤ 15%, per-source ≤ 3% after exclusions).
• iThenticate — secondary checks for borderline or revised cases.

• Text recycling must be minimal, properly paraphrased, and cited.
• Salami publication (fragmenting one study into overlapping papers) is prohibited.
• Translations of published work require transparency and permission; generally discouraged unless fully justified.
• Preprints are permitted with clear disclosure; the journal submission must be substantially revised.

Language tools may assist readability but must not be used to mask unattributed copying. Authors remain fully responsible for originality, accuracy, and citation.

• Grammar/Paraphrase tools may be used for polishing; do not rewrite large blocks from sources. Ensure paraphrases are genuinely original and attributed.
• Translation tools may assist, but authors must verify accuracy and still cite the original sources of ideas/data.

• Before review: Manuscripts above thresholds are returned for correction or rejected.
• During/after review: Confirmed plagiarism results in rejection; for published articles, SHMW may issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions following COPE flowcharts.
• Serious/repeat violations: May trigger submission bans and notification to institutions/funders.

Strong plagiarism control protects authors, strengthens the credibility of research, and ensures that clinical and occupational health policies draw on trustworthy, original evidence. With professional screening tools (Turnitin, iThenticate), careful citation management (Mendeley), language support where appropriate, and transparent reporting, SHMW helps authors deliver manuscripts that are both rigorous and ethically sound.