Enhancing Firm Efficiency Measurement Using DEA and Fuzzy Approaches with Integrated Corporate Social Responsibility

Authors

  • Gallego Gaillard Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
  • Keskin Behrouznia Department of Logistics, Wrocław University of Economics and Business, Wrocław, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69725/jebi.v1i4.134

Keywords:

Dynamic DEA, CSR, Firm efficiency, Sustainability

Abstract

Purpose: We propose a new scientific approach by integrating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the measurement of firm efficiency through a dynamic fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. It aims to investigate the relationship between CSR practices and firm performance over time across industries.
Findings: Higher CSR engagement companies appear to obtain better efficiency scores and show resilience when adapting to external challenges. Especially, capital-intensive industries where environmental risk is high benefit most from integrating CSR into their operational structures. The corresponding dynamic fuzzy DEA model introduced by Yang, et al. (2023) successfully analyses the non-neutrality of input metrics on CSR resilience, along with uncertainties inherent in CSR metrics, hence offering valuable insights into their industry-specific and temporal variability.
Novelty: This research is the first to apply a dynamic fuzzy DEA approach to integrating CSR in terms of a key measure of firm efficiency. This study fills the gap between sustainability practices and operational performance by addressing the complexity of multifaceted impacts of CSR.
Implications: These results provide practical recommendations for policy makers and managers to reflect the reconciliation of environmental or social objectives with financial performance in CSR strategies. Moreover, the methodological framework paves the way for other studies to consider dynamic and uncertain variables into efficiency measurement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Gallego Gaillard, Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland

    Gallego Gaillard
    Lecture
    Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wrocław, Poland

  • Keskin Behrouznia, Department of Logistics, Wrocław University of Economics and Business, Wrocław, Poland

    Keskin Behrouznia
    Lecture
    Department of Logistics, Wrocław University of Economics and Business, Wrocław, Poland

References

Ali, S. S., & Kaur, R. (2021). Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in implementation of social sustainability in warehousing of developing countries: A hybrid approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129154

Aparicio, J., Cordero, J. M., & Ortiz, L. (2019). Measuring efficiency in education: The influence of imprecision and variability in data on DEA estimates. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.03.004

Atanasovska, I., Choudhary, S., Koh, L., Ketikidis, P. H., & Solomon, A. (2022). Research gaps and future directions on social value stemming from circular economy practices in agri-food industrial parks: Insights from a systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131753. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131753

Athanassopoulos, A., & Gounaris, C. (2001). Assessing the technical and allocative efficiency of hospital operations in Greece and its resource allocation implications. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), 416–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00180-6

Belu, C., & Manescu, C. (2013). Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance. Applied Economics, 45(19), 2751–2764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2012.676734

Boubaker, S., Le, T. D. Q., Manita, R., & Ngo, T. (2023). The trade-off frontier for ESG and Sharpe ratio: a bootstrapped double-frontier data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05506-z

Busch, D. (2021). Sustainability Disclosure in the EU Financial Sector BT - Sustainable Finance in Europe: Corporate Governance, Financial Stability and Financial Markets (D. Busch, G. Ferrarini, & S. Grünewald (eds.); pp. 397–443). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71834-3_12

Carroll, A. J., Labarthe, D. R., Huffman, M. D., & Hitsman, B. (2016). Global tobacco prevention and control in relation to a cardiovascular health promotion and disease prevention framework: A narrative review. Preventive Medicine, 93, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.004

Chen, C.-M., Delmas, M. A., & Lieberman, M. B. (2015). Production frontier methodologies and efficiency as a performance measure in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2199

Costa, R., & Menichini, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for CSR assessment: The importance of the stakeholder perception. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.028

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1984). The Structure of Technical Efficiency BT - Topics in Production Theory (F. R. Førsund (ed.); pp. 81–90). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07123-4_6

Ferrarini, G. (2021). Redefining Corporate Purpose: Sustainability as a Game Changer BT - Sustainable Finance in Europe: Corporate Governance, Financial Stability and Financial Markets (D. Busch, G. Ferrarini, & S. Grünewald (eds.); pp. 85–150). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71834-3_4

Fordham, A. E., Robinson, G. M., Cleary, J., Dirk Blackwell, B., & Van Leeuwen, J. (2018). Use of a multiple capital framework to identify improvements in the CSR strategies of Australian resource companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 200, 704–730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.184

Forouzandeh, F., Arman, H., Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Masoud Rahimi, A. (2022). A combination of DEA and AIMSUN to manage big data when evaluating the performance of bus lines. Information Sciences, 618, 72–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.044

Gaganis, C., Pasiouras, F., Tasiou, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2021). CISEF: A composite index of social, environmental and financial performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 291(1), 394–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.035

Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J., & Murugesan, P. (2015). Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046

Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123–135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.019

Kandpal, V., Jaswal, A., Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. R., & Agarwal, N. (2024). Corporate Social Responsibility (C.S.R.) and E.S.G. Reporting: Redefining Business in the Twenty-First Century BT - Sustainable Energy Transition: Circular Economy and Sustainable Financing for Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Practices (V. Kandpal, A. Jaswal, E. D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, & N. Agarwal (eds.); pp. 239–272). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52943-6_8

Lee, J., Kwon, H.-B., & Pati, N. (2019). Exploring the relative impact of R&D and operational efficiency on performance: A sequential regression-neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 137, 420–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.026

Lima-Serrano, M., González-Méndez, M. I., Martín-Castaño, C., Alonso-Araujo, I., & Lima-Rodríguez, J. S. (2018). Predictive validity and reliability of the Braden scale for risk assessment of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. Medicina Intensiva (English Edition), 42(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2018.01.007

Maltz, E., Thompson, F., & Ringold, D. J. (2011). Assessing and maximizing corporate social initiatives: a strategic view of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Affairs, 11(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.384

Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 259–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025

Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Streimikiene, D., Jusoh, A., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1298–1322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.030

Modell, S. (2005). Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.03.001

Müftüoglu, I. B., Knudsen, S., Dale, R. F., Eiken, O., Rajak, D., & Lange, S. (2018). Rethinking access: Key methodological challenges in studying energy companies. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 250–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.019

Nguyen, M., Bensemann, J., & Kelly, S. (2018). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Vietnam: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0032-5

Oliveira, R., Zanella, A., & Camanho, A. S. (2020). A temporal progressive analysis of the social performance of mining firms based on a Malmquist index estimated with a Benefit-of-the-Doubt directional model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 121807. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121807

Ortiz-Avram, D., Domnanovich, J., Kronenberg, C., & Scholz, M. (2018). Exploring the integration of corporate social responsibility into the strategies of small- and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 254–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.011

Phillips, S., Thai, V. V, & Halim, Z. (2019). Airline Value Chain Capabilities and CSR Performance: The Connection Between CSR Leadership and CSR Culture with CSR Performance, Customer Satisfaction and Financial Performance. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.03.005

Ruggiero, J. (2000). Measuring technical efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00010-7

Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010a). An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA – A third pole of technical efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1554–1563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.014

Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010b). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003

Veldhuizen, C., Desouza, K. C., Bandara, W., & Chang, A. (2022). How much is not enough: Corporate social responsibility and beyond in the resources sector. Resources Policy, 79, 102960. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102960

Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Leopizzi, R., Mastroleo, G., & Mio, C. (2017). How can CSR identity be evaluated? A pilot study using a Fuzzy Expert System. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1000–1010. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.172

Wang, X. (2023). Exploring the role of resource industry dependence and green finance in green development efficiency in the context of post-Covid-19 period. Resources Policy, 85, 103866. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103866

Weerakkody, V., Sivarajah, U., Mahroof, K., Maruyama, T., & Lu, S. (2021). Influencing subjective well-being for business and sustainable development using big data and predictive regression analysis. Journal of Business Research, 131, 520–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.038

Xie, J., & Jain, T. (2024). Unpacking micro-CSR through a computational literature review: An identity heterogeneity view of internal stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 172, 114451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114451

Zekos, G. I. (2021). E-Globalization and Digital Economy BT - Economics and Law of Artificial Intelligence: Finance, Economic Impacts, Risk Management and Governance (G. I. Zekos (ed.); pp. 13–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64254-9_2

Zhou, F., Wang, X., Lim, M. K., He, Y., & Li, L. (2018). Sustainable recycling partner selection using fuzzy DEMATEL-AEW-FVIKOR: A case study in small-and-medium enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 489–504. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.247

Zylbersztajn, D., & Farina, E. M. M. Q. (1999). Strictly coordinated food-systems: exploring the limits of the Coasian firm. The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 2(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(00)00014-8

Published

2025-01-10

How to Cite

Enhancing Firm Efficiency Measurement Using DEA and Fuzzy Approaches with Integrated Corporate Social Responsibility. (2025). Journal Economic Business Innovation, 1(4), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.69725/jebi.v1i4.134

Share

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.